Latest Activity

Profile IconChandan Barman, HAREKRUSHNA MOHANTY, VIRENDER and 3 more joined LIS Links
11 hours ago
Dr. Prakasan P.M. posted a discussion
12 hours ago
Namita Bayan is attending MD SAFIQUR RAHAMAN's event

Mastering Scholarly Literature Discovery: Indexing, Open Access & Full Text Databases at Online

November 13, 2026 at 7:30pm to November 15, 2026 at 8:30pm
12 hours ago
Salma Zulfeen updated their profile
yesterday
RAMESH left a comment for Arumugam.J
yesterday
RAMESH left a comment for Dr Prakriti Ranjan Goswami
yesterday
RAMESH left a comment for Apurba Jyoti Majumder
yesterday
Dr. Hema Thakur posted an event

Two-Day National Seminar on “Smart Libraries: Integrating AI, IoT, and Intelligent Systems for Next-Generation Knowledge Services at Chitkara University, Himachal Pradesh (Pinjore-Nalagarh National Highway (NH-21A), kalujhinda, Baddi, Himachal Pradesh

February 19, 2027 to February 20, 2027
yesterday
RAMESH posted an event
Thumbnail

29th National Convention on Knowledge, Library and Information Networking (NACLIN 2026) at Hotel The Park Hyderabad, Raj Bhavan Road, Somajiguda, Hyderabad*

November 26, 2026 at 9pm to November 27, 2026 at 4pm
yesterday
Khadeeja Mohammed Nizam Ansari posted events
yesterday
Kajal Kumari and Mukesh Kumar Prajapat are now friends
Tuesday
Ravish Verma is attending Dr. ARJUN's event
Tuesday

Can we consider primary sources always authentic?

Can we consider primary sources authentic source of Information?

Views: 447

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear Ms. Namrata Joshi,

Thanks for your post and addressing quite a complex issue.

In one way, the primary sources, as, say, articles in periodicals or Conference Proceedings,

where the original works are generally presented/reported for the first time by person(s) originally created it. In this sense it can be regarded to be authentic. By the way, I am using the word Authentic to mean its accuracy or that the reportage is Perfect or correct

However, it can always happen (& quite naturally, especially for experimental research) that the process/technique/formulation etc. etc.during experimentation (&/or analysis) might be faulty or erroneous. As such, as you can easily understand the inference or the reportage itself should be erroneous!! As such, it was not not authentic in the sense that it is not correct!! In many Scientific Research such first reports were later found to be incorrect!!

So it implies that answer to your query can be answered as YES & NO at the same time!!

Sincerely,

Siddhartha Shankar Ray

thanks for reply sir!

I am still confused ,because i am totally agree with the information in given link

http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/education/008-3010-e.html

please see the link.

 

Your question is bit amusing!.  It is like asking someone - can truth be trusted or believed not be lie!!?

Primary sources are the original sources. They provide first-hand testimony or direct evidence concerning a topic under investigation. They are created by witnesses or recorders who experienced the events or conditions being documented. Often these sources are created at the time when the events or conditions are occurring.  Primary sources can include autobiographies, memoirs,manuscripts, tablets, stone inscriptions, coins etc. that leads to  information of some form for that matter.

These sources have to be authentic always.  No one can question or dispute this.

Dear sir!

thks for your reply but please see the link below,

http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/education/008-3010-e.html

thank you!

You should have then made the context of your question very clear to  everybody to elicit specific answers from them!

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp