Latest Activity

Profile IconSwati Malvi, S.Francis Selvaraj and Siva M joined LIS Links
4 hours ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a blog post
yesterday
Dr.Stephen.G was featured
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
yesterday
Surendra Singh left a comment for Arnica Kumari
yesterday
Profile IconAyushi kushwaha, Shyamghan Nayak, Raja Rajeshwari G and 1 more joined LIS Links
Tuesday
Profile IconRamachandran K, KASTHURI PRIYA, Ashutosh Panigrahi and 1 more joined LIS Links
Monday
Dr. T. Raja updated their profile
Monday
N.Harilakshmi posted a discussion
Monday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Saturday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted discussions
Saturday
Dr. Ashis Biswas posted events
Saturday
Profile IconAshwini C, PILLI HARSHA, Uchenna Okafor and 3 more joined LIS Links
Saturday
Dr. Ashis Biswas might attend Dr. Ashis Biswas's event
Thumbnail

RESCOMM 2025: Research Communication Conclave at Ashoka University

December 17, 2025 at 9am to December 19, 2025 at 6pm
Friday
Parthasarathivamanan.K posted an event

International Conference at Hybrid Mode (Offline and Online)

December 12, 2025 at 9am to December 13, 2025 at 6pm
Friday
Dr. Ashis Biswas updated their profile
Nov 12
KUNAL GAURAV updated their profile
Nov 12
Profile IconRajasri Jayavel, SHEEBA S, MD NEYAZ HUSSAIN and 1 more joined LIS Links
Nov 11
A. A. T. Hasan posted a discussion
Nov 9
SWAPNA SOURAV is now a member of LIS Links
Nov 9

Can we consider primary sources always authentic?

Can we consider primary sources authentic source of Information?

Views: 365

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear Ms. Namrata Joshi,

Thanks for your post and addressing quite a complex issue.

In one way, the primary sources, as, say, articles in periodicals or Conference Proceedings,

where the original works are generally presented/reported for the first time by person(s) originally created it. In this sense it can be regarded to be authentic. By the way, I am using the word Authentic to mean its accuracy or that the reportage is Perfect or correct

However, it can always happen (& quite naturally, especially for experimental research) that the process/technique/formulation etc. etc.during experimentation (&/or analysis) might be faulty or erroneous. As such, as you can easily understand the inference or the reportage itself should be erroneous!! As such, it was not not authentic in the sense that it is not correct!! In many Scientific Research such first reports were later found to be incorrect!!

So it implies that answer to your query can be answered as YES & NO at the same time!!

Sincerely,

Siddhartha Shankar Ray

thanks for reply sir!

I am still confused ,because i am totally agree with the information in given link

http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/education/008-3010-e.html

please see the link.

 

Your question is bit amusing!.  It is like asking someone - can truth be trusted or believed not be lie!!?

Primary sources are the original sources. They provide first-hand testimony or direct evidence concerning a topic under investigation. They are created by witnesses or recorders who experienced the events or conditions being documented. Often these sources are created at the time when the events or conditions are occurring.  Primary sources can include autobiographies, memoirs,manuscripts, tablets, stone inscriptions, coins etc. that leads to  information of some form for that matter.

These sources have to be authentic always.  No one can question or dispute this.

Dear sir!

thks for your reply but please see the link below,

http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/education/008-3010-e.html

thank you!

You should have then made the context of your question very clear to  everybody to elicit specific answers from them!

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop