Latest Activity

Sanjana saini and Akshay Subhash Gadade are now friends
15 hours ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN replied to Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN's discussion Call for Book Chapters: Digital Leadership in Library & Information Centers (Innovative Strategies in Library Management) by Ess Ess Publications.
yesterday
Dr.Rajeshwar kumar G replied to Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN's discussion Call for Book Chapters: Digital Leadership in Library & Information Centers (Innovative Strategies in Library Management) by Ess Ess Publications.
yesterday
Arunima Giri might attend Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN's event
yesterday
Shruthi updated their profile
Thursday
Mahesh B. updated their profile
Tuesday
Akshay Subhash Gadade joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Tuesday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Monday
K Chiyuh commented on Hema Thakur's event 'One Day National Seminar on the Future of Libraries in the Era of Artificial Intelligence'
Monday
K Chiyuh might attend Hema Thakur's event
Monday
Mr.Vipul Kumar updated their profile
Monday
Mr.Vipul Kumar shared a profile on Facebook
Monday
Profile IconUmasankar mahata, Nikita Medhi, Prohlad Basumatary and 81 more joined LIS Links
Monday
Dr. SUDHI S VIJAYAN posted a discussion
Monday
Kanika sharma is now friends with Ramesh Kumar and Deepak Sharma
Apr 19
Oriental Library Association shared their discussion on Facebook
Apr 16
Sumit Sundar Ray updated their profile
Apr 15
Alka Gohel posted a discussion
Apr 15
Anna Poorani posted a blog post
Apr 15
Manoj Kumar posted a blog post
Apr 15

Can we consider primary sources always authentic?

Can we consider primary sources authentic source of Information?

Views: 404

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear Ms. Namrata Joshi,

Thanks for your post and addressing quite a complex issue.

In one way, the primary sources, as, say, articles in periodicals or Conference Proceedings,

where the original works are generally presented/reported for the first time by person(s) originally created it. In this sense it can be regarded to be authentic. By the way, I am using the word Authentic to mean its accuracy or that the reportage is Perfect or correct

However, it can always happen (& quite naturally, especially for experimental research) that the process/technique/formulation etc. etc.during experimentation (&/or analysis) might be faulty or erroneous. As such, as you can easily understand the inference or the reportage itself should be erroneous!! As such, it was not not authentic in the sense that it is not correct!! In many Scientific Research such first reports were later found to be incorrect!!

So it implies that answer to your query can be answered as YES & NO at the same time!!

Sincerely,

Siddhartha Shankar Ray

thanks for reply sir!

I am still confused ,because i am totally agree with the information in given link

http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/education/008-3010-e.html

please see the link.

 

Your question is bit amusing!.  It is like asking someone - can truth be trusted or believed not be lie!!?

Primary sources are the original sources. They provide first-hand testimony or direct evidence concerning a topic under investigation. They are created by witnesses or recorders who experienced the events or conditions being documented. Often these sources are created at the time when the events or conditions are occurring.  Primary sources can include autobiographies, memoirs,manuscripts, tablets, stone inscriptions, coins etc. that leads to  information of some form for that matter.

These sources have to be authentic always.  No one can question or dispute this.

Dear sir!

thks for your reply but please see the link below,

http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/education/008-3010-e.html

thank you!

You should have then made the context of your question very clear to  everybody to elicit specific answers from them!

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp