Latest Activity

Profile IconPrem prakash Shukla, Sunitkumar, Shivam Tanwar and 25 more joined LIS Links
7 hours ago
melvin jebaraj posted an event
7 hours ago
Puneet Kumar posted a blog post
7 hours ago
Dr. Badan Barman and THAKKAR VIVEK RAJESHKUMAR are now friends
7 hours ago
Mr.Vipul Kumar updated their profile
13 hours ago
Mr.Vipul Kumar replied to Dr. Badan Barman's discussion Circular from Gujarat Government-Page-1 in the group Circular in Library and Information Science
13 hours ago
Mr.Vipul Kumar joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
13 hours ago
Mrs. Yasmin Ismail updated their profile
Wednesday
Mrs. Yasmin Ismail posted a status
"HAPPY LIBRARIANS DAY"
Wednesday
S. Jaffer Basha left a comment for Pallavi Sushant Sapkal
Tuesday
Mrs. Yasmin Ismail and SAGHIR ALAM KHAN are now friends
Tuesday
Shilpa Dhoble and Ravish Verma are now friends
Tuesday
Samir Rama fatte and Dr. Anjaneya Naik are now friends
Tuesday
Appasaheb Naikal updated their profile
Monday
PRADEEP SHARMA updated their profile
Monday
Boyet V Essave replied to Abilash Achuthan's discussion Kerala PSC Previous Question Papers and Answer Key - LIS
Sunday
Hemant Kumar updated their profile
Sunday
Hemant Kumar and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
Sunday
Dr. Anjaneya Naik shared a profile on Facebook
Sunday
Dr. Anjaneya Naik updated their profile
Sunday

Can we consider primary sources always authentic?

Can we consider primary sources authentic source of Information?

Views: 428

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear Ms. Namrata Joshi,

Thanks for your post and addressing quite a complex issue.

In one way, the primary sources, as, say, articles in periodicals or Conference Proceedings,

where the original works are generally presented/reported for the first time by person(s) originally created it. In this sense it can be regarded to be authentic. By the way, I am using the word Authentic to mean its accuracy or that the reportage is Perfect or correct

However, it can always happen (& quite naturally, especially for experimental research) that the process/technique/formulation etc. etc.during experimentation (&/or analysis) might be faulty or erroneous. As such, as you can easily understand the inference or the reportage itself should be erroneous!! As such, it was not not authentic in the sense that it is not correct!! In many Scientific Research such first reports were later found to be incorrect!!

So it implies that answer to your query can be answered as YES & NO at the same time!!

Sincerely,

Siddhartha Shankar Ray

thanks for reply sir!

I am still confused ,because i am totally agree with the information in given link

http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/education/008-3010-e.html

please see the link.

 

Your question is bit amusing!.  It is like asking someone - can truth be trusted or believed not be lie!!?

Primary sources are the original sources. They provide first-hand testimony or direct evidence concerning a topic under investigation. They are created by witnesses or recorders who experienced the events or conditions being documented. Often these sources are created at the time when the events or conditions are occurring.  Primary sources can include autobiographies, memoirs,manuscripts, tablets, stone inscriptions, coins etc. that leads to  information of some form for that matter.

These sources have to be authentic always.  No one can question or dispute this.

Dear sir!

thks for your reply but please see the link below,

http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/education/008-3010-e.html

thank you!

You should have then made the context of your question very clear to  everybody to elicit specific answers from them!

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp