LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

MOHD ASHRAF updated their profile
2 hours ago
Dr. Manash Esh updated their profile
yesterday
Damodar Dashrath Waghmare updated their profile
Saturday
KADARI NAVEEN KUMAR updated their profile
Thursday
Dr. Rajesh Chutia updated their profile
Tuesday
Kapil Sunehria updated their profile
Aug 4
Kapil Sunehria and Millan Krushna Dutta are now friends
Aug 3
Dr. N. Kadiresan left a comment for Dr. Badan Barman
Aug 3
Chavda Jitendra Kumar Ambalal updated their profile
Aug 1
Chavda Jitendra Kumar Ambalal joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Aug 1
Chavda Jitendra Kumar Ambalal joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Aug 1
Jeffrey Epstein commented on Jeffrey Epstein's album
Aug 1
Jeffrey Epstein commented on Jeffrey Epstein's album
Aug 1
S RAVI posted a status
""Call for Chapter Contribution in Editorial Book…"
Jul 31
S RAVI posted a status
Jul 31
S RAVI posted a status
"Call for Chapter Contribution in Editorial Book "Introduction to Metrics Studies" https://drive.google.com/drive/home"
Jul 31
Jeffrey Epstein commented on Jeffrey Epstein's album
Jul 31
LAITHANGBAM NEPOLEAN SINGH is attending Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN's event
Jul 30
SHWETHA KV updated their profile
Jul 29
Dr. Tarvinder Singh Handa updated their profile
Jul 29

Can we consider primary sources always authentic?

Can we consider primary sources authentic source of Information?

Views: 361

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear Ms. Namrata Joshi,

Thanks for your post and addressing quite a complex issue.

In one way, the primary sources, as, say, articles in periodicals or Conference Proceedings,

where the original works are generally presented/reported for the first time by person(s) originally created it. In this sense it can be regarded to be authentic. By the way, I am using the word Authentic to mean its accuracy or that the reportage is Perfect or correct

However, it can always happen (& quite naturally, especially for experimental research) that the process/technique/formulation etc. etc.during experimentation (&/or analysis) might be faulty or erroneous. As such, as you can easily understand the inference or the reportage itself should be erroneous!! As such, it was not not authentic in the sense that it is not correct!! In many Scientific Research such first reports were later found to be incorrect!!

So it implies that answer to your query can be answered as YES & NO at the same time!!

Sincerely,

Siddhartha Shankar Ray

thanks for reply sir!

I am still confused ,because i am totally agree with the information in given link

http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/education/008-3010-e.html

please see the link.

 

Your question is bit amusing!.  It is like asking someone - can truth be trusted or believed not be lie!!?

Primary sources are the original sources. They provide first-hand testimony or direct evidence concerning a topic under investigation. They are created by witnesses or recorders who experienced the events or conditions being documented. Often these sources are created at the time when the events or conditions are occurring.  Primary sources can include autobiographies, memoirs,manuscripts, tablets, stone inscriptions, coins etc. that leads to  information of some form for that matter.

These sources have to be authentic always.  No one can question or dispute this.

Dear sir!

thks for your reply but please see the link below,

http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/education/008-3010-e.html

thank you!

You should have then made the context of your question very clear to  everybody to elicit specific answers from them!

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop