LIS Links Becoming More Social

Latest Activity


Rising Star
Bidyut Bikash Kalita posted a blog post
yesterday
Mali Hitendra Bhagwan is attending Bidyut Bikash Kalita's event

7 Days Faculty Development Programme (FDP) on AI IN EDUCATION AND RESEARCH at Assam

October 9, 2026 at 6pm to October 15, 2026 at 7pm
Saturday
Mali Hitendra Bhagwan is attending MD SAFIQUR RAHAMAN's event
Saturday
Mali Hitendra Bhagwan is attending Khadeeja Mohammed Nizam Ansari's event

Librarianship in the AI Era: A 5-Day Practical Skill Development Programme at Online

October 20, 2026 at 7pm to October 24, 2026 at 7pm
Saturday
Dr. S Pachauri posted a discussion
Friday
Ayushi Soni posted a discussion
Friday
Amit Suwal posted a discussion
Friday
Profile IconRahul Barman, Antoriksh Roy Choudhury, Dhaneshwar Paikra and 8 more joined LIS Links
Friday
Dr. V. Senthur Velmurugan and Rinku are now friends
Friday
Rinku commented on Dr. V. Senthur Velmurugan's event 'One-Day National Seminar on Artificial Intelligence and Academic Libraries: Issues and Opportunities in the 21st Century'
Friday
Rinku is attending Dr. V. Senthur Velmurugan's event
Friday
Rinku is attending Dr. Manoj Das's event
Thumbnail

Two-Day Online National Workshop on Library Automation Using Koha at Cooch Behar, West Bengal

October 2, 2026 at 11am to October 3, 2026 at 5pm
Friday

Can we consider primary sources always authentic?

Can we consider primary sources authentic source of Information?

Views: 442

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear Ms. Namrata Joshi,

Thanks for your post and addressing quite a complex issue.

In one way, the primary sources, as, say, articles in periodicals or Conference Proceedings,

where the original works are generally presented/reported for the first time by person(s) originally created it. In this sense it can be regarded to be authentic. By the way, I am using the word Authentic to mean its accuracy or that the reportage is Perfect or correct

However, it can always happen (& quite naturally, especially for experimental research) that the process/technique/formulation etc. etc.during experimentation (&/or analysis) might be faulty or erroneous. As such, as you can easily understand the inference or the reportage itself should be erroneous!! As such, it was not not authentic in the sense that it is not correct!! In many Scientific Research such first reports were later found to be incorrect!!

So it implies that answer to your query can be answered as YES & NO at the same time!!

Sincerely,

Siddhartha Shankar Ray

thanks for reply sir!

I am still confused ,because i am totally agree with the information in given link

http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/education/008-3010-e.html

please see the link.

 

Your question is bit amusing!.  It is like asking someone - can truth be trusted or believed not be lie!!?

Primary sources are the original sources. They provide first-hand testimony or direct evidence concerning a topic under investigation. They are created by witnesses or recorders who experienced the events or conditions being documented. Often these sources are created at the time when the events or conditions are occurring.  Primary sources can include autobiographies, memoirs,manuscripts, tablets, stone inscriptions, coins etc. that leads to  information of some form for that matter.

These sources have to be authentic always.  No one can question or dispute this.

Dear sir!

thks for your reply but please see the link below,

http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/education/008-3010-e.html

thank you!

You should have then made the context of your question very clear to  everybody to elicit specific answers from them!

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp