Latest Activity

Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a blog post
3 hours ago
Dr.Stephen.G was featured
23 hours ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
yesterday
Surendra Singh left a comment for Arnica Kumari
yesterday
Profile IconAyushi kushwaha, Shyamghan Nayak, Raja Rajeshwari G and 1 more joined LIS Links
yesterday
Profile IconRamachandran K, KASTHURI PRIYA, Ashutosh Panigrahi and 1 more joined LIS Links
Monday
Dr. T. Raja updated their profile
Monday
N.Harilakshmi posted a discussion
Monday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Saturday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted discussions
Saturday
Dr. Ashis Biswas posted events
Saturday
Profile IconAshwini C, PILLI HARSHA, Uchenna Okafor and 3 more joined LIS Links
Saturday
Dr. Ashis Biswas might attend Dr. Ashis Biswas's event
Thumbnail

RESCOMM 2025: Research Communication Conclave at Ashoka University

December 17, 2025 at 9am to December 19, 2025 at 6pm
Friday
Parthasarathivamanan.K posted an event

International Conference at Hybrid Mode (Offline and Online)

December 12, 2025 at 9am to December 13, 2025 at 6pm
Friday
Dr. Ashis Biswas updated their profile
Nov 12
KUNAL GAURAV updated their profile
Nov 12
Profile IconRajasri Jayavel, SHEEBA S, MD NEYAZ HUSSAIN and 1 more joined LIS Links
Nov 11
A. A. T. Hasan posted a discussion
Nov 9
SWAPNA SOURAV is now a member of LIS Links
Nov 9
Dr. Yogesh Subhashrao Kantale updated their profile
Nov 8

Dear all,

I am of the opinion that the present pattern of UGC NET examination has several inherent basic flaws and is therefore not a better asssessment or filtration system.  It does not necessarily separate the wheat from the chaff.

Being an objective examination with no negative marking, the passing of the examination has become just a matter of chance and not necessarily that of intelligence. UGC has made  a mockery of such an important examination as NET. In trying to simplify the examination, it has only diluted the process wherein any Tom, Dick and Harry can aspire to clear the same. 

Earlier we had Descriptive pattern wherein - the ability of the students to express, analyse in depth and present the pros and cons of a topic, hold on to a argument, language and comprehension skills etc were tested.  The candidates were tested in a credible crucible.

All that has gone now.  Should we embrace such a system??

Views: 3448

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

I am also agree with Mr.R.K
I am also agree with Mr.R.K

I am agree to Mr. R K

 

Dear Mr. Sarvesh

Do you think that earlier pattern is better than this. No because,  according to earlier pattern, those who have passed the library science course long back it is very difficult to remember deep descriptive knowledge. But this new pattern just we should have current knowledge. I agree with Mr R K  is right.

G Halkar

I m agree with Mr.R.K.

I think UGC must retain one or two discriptive question also...... which should be answered in 300 words or more..........  This is true that one with good handwriting would naturally have an advantage........but it will guarantee the levels of standardization which UGC NET craves for........ Just my view !  But we all should wait for the final result to appear !

I am agree with Mr. R.K. Sir  Because 3rd paper can be solved who have detail  study of library and information science some questions were confusing those who are doing study from last 2-3 year or who have qualified SET etc

ur way of thinking is wrong my friend. Because the descriptive version in the ugc causes lot of language problems, there is no permission to write the exam in regional language , except hindi and english.some body knows the answer but he is unable to present the answer because of language problem. and one more thing is june 24th 2012 net exam is very hard especially the third paper. I hope this type of standard is well

enough for ugc net . this is my personal opinion.

you are right Mr. Sarvesh, i m fully agree with you. Objective mood is not good for the teaching post like Assistant Professor.

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop