International Seminar on Redefining Research Excellence: Data to Discovery at Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
September 11, 2026 from 8:30am to 6:30pm
LIS Links
First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India
LIS Links Becoming More Social
Birthdays
Birthdays Today
Latest Activity
International Conference on “Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Higher Education in India: Opportunities, Challenges, and Sustainable Development” (ICAI-FHE 2026)
September 19, 2026 from 6pm to 7pmNominations are Invited for Professor Sonal Singh Best LIS Teacher Award-2026
August 26, 2026 at 6pm to September 2, 2026 at 7pm
Invitation to Present | SoFerence 2026: A Global Platform to Showcase AI Use Cases in Libraries at Virtual
September 10, 2026 from 9:30am to 5pm
Webinar on DELNET: Resources and Services at Online
September 9, 2026 from 3pm to 4pm
UGC-MMTTP Online Two Week Refresher Course in Library and Information Science at RAMANUJAN COLLEGE, UNIVERSITY OF DELHI
August 31, 2026 at 10:30am to September 14, 2026 at 5:30pm
Present NET pattern
Dear all,
I am of the opinion that the present pattern of UGC NET examination has several inherent basic flaws and is therefore not a better asssessment or filtration system. It does not necessarily separate the wheat from the chaff.
Being an objective examination with no negative marking, the passing of the examination has become just a matter of chance and not necessarily that of intelligence. UGC has made a mockery of such an important examination as NET. In trying to simplify the examination, it has only diluted the process wherein any Tom, Dick and Harry can aspire to clear the same.
Earlier we had Descriptive pattern wherein - the ability of the students to express, analyse in depth and present the pros and cons of a topic, hold on to a argument, language and comprehension skills etc were tested. The candidates were tested in a credible crucible.
All that has gone now. Should we embrace such a system??
Views: 3771
Replies to This Forum
-
Permalink Reply by MUKESH K SHAHI on
-
I am also agree with Mr.R.K
-
-
I am also agree with Mr.R.K
-
Permalink Reply by Priya Madaan on
-
I am agree to Mr. R K
-
Permalink Reply by Dr.Giriraj Halkar on
-
Dear Mr. Sarvesh
Do you think that earlier pattern is better than this. No because, according to earlier pattern, those who have passed the library science course long back it is very difficult to remember deep descriptive knowledge. But this new pattern just we should have current knowledge. I agree with Mr R K is right.
G Halkar
-
Permalink Reply by Inderjit Kaur on
-
I m agree with Mr.R.K.
-
Permalink Reply by Dr.Harmanpreet Singh Sandhu on
-
I think UGC must retain one or two discriptive question also...... which should be answered in 300 words or more.......... This is true that one with good handwriting would naturally have an advantage........but it will guarantee the levels of standardization which UGC NET craves for........ Just my view ! But we all should wait for the final result to appear !
-
Permalink Reply by Dr. Anantkumar B.Sarkale on
-
I am agree with Mr. R.K. Sir Because 3rd paper can be solved who have detail study of library and information science some questions were confusing those who are doing study from last 2-3 year or who have qualified SET etc
-
Permalink Reply by S R RAM on
-
ur way of thinking is wrong my friend. Because the descriptive version in the ugc causes lot of language problems, there is no permission to write the exam in regional language , except hindi and english.some body knows the answer but he is unable to present the answer because of language problem. and one more thing is june 24th 2012 net exam is very hard especially the third paper. I hope this type of standard is well
enough for ugc net . this is my personal opinion.
-
Permalink Reply by ajay on
-
you are right Mr. Sarvesh, i m fully agree with you. Objective mood is not good for the teaching post like Assistant Professor.
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
© 2026 Created by Dr. Badan Barman.
Powered by
