Latest Activity

Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
18 hours ago
Bidyut Bikash Kalita posted blog posts
19 hours ago
Profile IconBidyut Bikash Kalita, SANTHOSHA M, Pooja devi and 7 more joined LIS Links
yesterday
Dr. Badan Barman posted a blog post
yesterday
Praveen Kumar and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
Thursday
Praveen Kumar updated their profile
Thursday
Anandanayaka S G updated their profile
Wednesday
Dr.W.Vijaya Shoba shared their event on Facebook
Jan 24
Dr.W.Vijaya Shoba posted an event
Thumbnail

Stress and Stress Management for College Students at Kaliakkavilai

January 30, 2026 from 3pm to 4pm
Jan 22
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Jan 22
Sachin Chourasia updated their profile
Jan 20
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted an event

RRRLF-sponsored National Conference on Information Landscape: Trends and Innovations in Public and Academic Libraries (NCILTIPAL 2026) at Kasthurba Kalaiarangam, Vellalar College for Women (Autonomous), Thindal, Erode.

February 13, 2026 at 9am to February 14, 2026 at 5pm
Jan 20
Profile Iconsanthosh kumar, D.Seshu Kumari, Shruthi and 4 more joined LIS Links
Jan 20
Dr.W.Vijaya Shoba shared a profile on Facebook
Jan 12
Accutek Packaging Machine updated their profile
Jan 6
Gurwinder Singh updated their profile
Jan 5
Adithya updated their profile
Jan 5
Parthasarathivamanan.K and Pushpanjali Shriram Patil are now friends
Jan 4
Dr Shiva Kumara SU updated their profile
Jan 4
Profile IconPushpa sahu, Abhishek Gupta, Shikha Pandey and 2 more joined LIS Links
Dec 30, 2025

Opinion against minium marks for different category

I have a serious objection towards the cut off mark essential for the General category of students who write the UGC exam. To decide a candidate if he has passed or failed in the UGC exam the differentiation in the marks is not acceptable. The eligibility to write UGC has a differentiation in marks which I do not object. But to decide if I have passed or failed in UGC has been declared with different marks for different category, which is very undigestable.Kindly consider and make an equal assessment for all categories. This is my personal opinion which i consider is essential for the future development of our country's education system.

Views: 1729

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

I too agreed with you Sir

I also belongs to OBC Category.I Have 61% in NET Exam, But I Filled my Form in Gen Category...Why? I Dont want to Hurt any Community, But I am Totaly Disagree with UGC Criteria for Qualifying UGC/NET Exam at different lavels. This system is Totaly wrong. I Want to say Much More on This Topic but there is No Use to Reading a book to a Buffalo. I Just Want to say that in India There are so many programmes started to get a tallent, like (DID, Sa Re Ga Ma Pa, Indian Idol, Sur Kshetra, and so on , Why they can't take desicion category wise, why they are in search of a talented singer or dancer. “Biology gives you a brain. Life turns it into a mind.” " God Gives us same Mind ,No Mind is Poor by Birth nor different by Race , Religion, Sex or Age"The purpose of education is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

You are right Ashok, there is no use in blowing BANSUREE here.

Today's  World's Greatest Personalities are on Peak Due to There Talent not due to their Religion, Race and Sex. 

Yes, apart from eligibility (PG percentage) criteria for appearing the NET exam, WE ALSO DO NOT MIND THE DIFFERENCE OF FEES for prospectus and NET registration. But disparity in qualifying NET percentage, is really regrettable.
Just an anology: you give discounts for appearing 100 mts race, but general candidate has to run 100 mts and others less than 100 mts is really demotivating.

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp