LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

LIS Links Becoming More Social

Latest Activity

Dr. Anil Kumar Jharotia left a comment for Munmi Saikia
1 hour ago
Dr. Anil Kumar Jharotia left a comment for Jasveer Kaur
1 hour ago
Dr. Anil Kumar Jharotia left a comment for Asha v madabhavi
1 hour ago
Dr. Anil Kumar Jharotia left a comment for ASHMITA VERMA
1 hour ago
Dr. Chiranjeevi L M updated their profile
4 hours ago
Dr. Bhopendra Kumar updated their profile
10 hours ago
SALAM BINOY SINGH is attending Dr. Sandip Pathak's event
Thumbnail

13th Convention Planner 2026 at Gauhati University,  Guwahati, Assam.

September 18, 2026 at 9am to September 20, 2026 at 7pm
21 hours ago
Paradip Sen Roy updated their profile
yesterday
vandana mittal replied to hem chandra's discussion Updating Shelf Location in Bulk in Egranthalaya 3.0
yesterday
vandana mittal updated their profile
yesterday
Akash Pathave updated their profile
yesterday
Sanjana Saini is now a member of LIS Links
yesterday
NAVEEN VIKRAM SINGH shared a profile on Facebook
Monday
Sanjeev Kalita updated their profile
Monday
pooja katoch updated their profile
Monday
vaishaliingale73 and VIJAYAKUMAR V are now friends
Sunday
Joydip Barman updated their profile
Sunday
Abiola Bawuah updated their profile
Sunday
hem chandra posted a discussion
Sunday
Dr. Gulshan Kumar Sachdeva posted a discussion
Sunday

Opinion against minium marks for different category

I have a serious objection towards the cut off mark essential for the General category of students who write the UGC exam. To decide a candidate if he has passed or failed in the UGC exam the differentiation in the marks is not acceptable. The eligibility to write UGC has a differentiation in marks which I do not object. But to decide if I have passed or failed in UGC has been declared with different marks for different category, which is very undigestable.Kindly consider and make an equal assessment for all categories. This is my personal opinion which i consider is essential for the future development of our country's education system.

Views: 1915

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

I too agreed with you Sir

I also belongs to OBC Category.I Have 61% in NET Exam, But I Filled my Form in Gen Category...Why? I Dont want to Hurt any Community, But I am Totaly Disagree with UGC Criteria for Qualifying UGC/NET Exam at different lavels. This system is Totaly wrong. I Want to say Much More on This Topic but there is No Use to Reading a book to a Buffalo. I Just Want to say that in India There are so many programmes started to get a tallent, like (DID, Sa Re Ga Ma Pa, Indian Idol, Sur Kshetra, and so on , Why they can't take desicion category wise, why they are in search of a talented singer or dancer. “Biology gives you a brain. Life turns it into a mind.” " God Gives us same Mind ,No Mind is Poor by Birth nor different by Race , Religion, Sex or Age"The purpose of education is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

You are right Ashok, there is no use in blowing BANSUREE here.

Today's  World's Greatest Personalities are on Peak Due to There Talent not due to their Religion, Race and Sex. 

Yes, apart from eligibility (PG percentage) criteria for appearing the NET exam, WE ALSO DO NOT MIND THE DIFFERENCE OF FEES for prospectus and NET registration. But disparity in qualifying NET percentage, is really regrettable.
Just an anology: you give discounts for appearing 100 mts race, but general candidate has to run 100 mts and others less than 100 mts is really demotivating.

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp