LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
28 minutes ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted discussions
1 hour ago
komal patel posted an event
Thumbnail

National Conference on Re-Imagining Libraries of Viksit Bharat 29-30 AUGUST 2025 at Bhopal

August 29, 2025 at 10am to August 30, 2025 at 5pm
1 hour ago
komal patel updated their profile
19 hours ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
yesterday
Dr. O Seshaiaih posted a discussion
yesterday
Jatin Baweja and Deepak Sharma are now friends
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a blog post
Tuesday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Tuesday
Profile IconJasvir kaur, Dr. Nilanjana Purkayastha, Aakib and 2 more joined LIS Links
Monday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Monday
Hemanta Kumar Biswal posted a blog post
Monday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Monday
Ramesh Kumar left a comment for Saaswatee Sahoo
Saturday
Himakhi Das updated their profile
Jun 20
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted an event
Jun 20
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a blog post
Jun 20
Profile IconAhana Guin, Harikrishnan Sahu, Akash Baliyan and 1 more joined LIS Links
Jun 19
Saaswatee Sahoo and Ramesh Kumar are now friends
Jun 19
Ramesh Kumar might attend Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN's event
Jun 19

Can we consider primary sources always authentic?

Can we consider primary sources authentic source of Information?

Views: 356

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear Ms. Namrata Joshi,

Thanks for your post and addressing quite a complex issue.

In one way, the primary sources, as, say, articles in periodicals or Conference Proceedings,

where the original works are generally presented/reported for the first time by person(s) originally created it. In this sense it can be regarded to be authentic. By the way, I am using the word Authentic to mean its accuracy or that the reportage is Perfect or correct

However, it can always happen (& quite naturally, especially for experimental research) that the process/technique/formulation etc. etc.during experimentation (&/or analysis) might be faulty or erroneous. As such, as you can easily understand the inference or the reportage itself should be erroneous!! As such, it was not not authentic in the sense that it is not correct!! In many Scientific Research such first reports were later found to be incorrect!!

So it implies that answer to your query can be answered as YES & NO at the same time!!

Sincerely,

Siddhartha Shankar Ray

thanks for reply sir!

I am still confused ,because i am totally agree with the information in given link

http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/education/008-3010-e.html

please see the link.

 

Your question is bit amusing!.  It is like asking someone - can truth be trusted or believed not be lie!!?

Primary sources are the original sources. They provide first-hand testimony or direct evidence concerning a topic under investigation. They are created by witnesses or recorders who experienced the events or conditions being documented. Often these sources are created at the time when the events or conditions are occurring.  Primary sources can include autobiographies, memoirs,manuscripts, tablets, stone inscriptions, coins etc. that leads to  information of some form for that matter.

These sources have to be authentic always.  No one can question or dispute this.

Dear sir!

thks for your reply but please see the link below,

http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/education/008-3010-e.html

thank you!

You should have then made the context of your question very clear to  everybody to elicit specific answers from them!

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop