Latest Activity

Gangaram Mogara Pawara updated their profile
45 minutes ago
Navdeep Sharma updated their profile
1 hour ago
Ku. Dipti Lodwal posted a status
"2Days Int. Seminar "Libraries and Information Technology:A Global Platform for Multidisciplinary Knowledge Integration&Innovation"28-29 Mar."
yesterday
Samit Mondal shared DHIRAJ KIRAN CHOGALE's event on Facebook
yesterday
GAURAV BHUSAN ARYA shared a profile on Facebook
Saturday
Bidyut Bikash Kalita posted a blog post
Saturday
Profile IconDhanu shri, Kumari Ankita, Arunima Giri and 2 more joined LIS Links
Saturday
Dr. Badan Barman posted a discussion
Saturday
Abhishek Chourasiya updated their profile
Feb 11
Profile IconSweety Angelirie Kharumnuid and Alka Solanki joined LIS Links
Feb 11
Dr. SUDHI S VIJAYAN posted an event
Feb 11
A.Mahesh left a comment for Dr. Badan Barman
Feb 9
Dr. N K Pachauri posted a discussion
Feb 9
A.Mahesh posted a blog post
Feb 9
Profile IconKatie Rodgerson, Swapna Khandekar, Ajay parmar and 9 more joined LIS Links
Feb 9
Kirtisharma updated their profile
Feb 6
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Feb 5
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted events
Feb 5
Abhishek Pingale updated their profile
Feb 5
Noor Aziz and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
Feb 5

Copyright isn't dead just because we're not willing to let it regulate us

Copyright isn't dead just because we're not willing to let it regulate us

March 24, 2012 - 4:21pm — Blake

The "copy" in copyright is there because of an accident of history: once upon a time, to "copy" was to do something industrial. Copying required physical plant, employees, premises, trading. While not everything industrial could be reduced to "copying," all copying was presumptively industrial. There were ways of non-industrially copying things – a sculptor could copy another sculptor's work by application of her eye and hand and chisel, a writer could dip his quill and set out the lines of another writer – but it wasn't really necessary to explicitly declare that this wasn't the kind of thing regulated by copyright. Such activity was almost always invisible to rights-holders, and even if an individual work happened to rise to the attention of a rights-holder, he would seem like a bit of a fool trying to apply industrial rules to individual actors. It's like asking your neighbours to register as a bed and breakfast because they've got guests in for the weekend who've chipped in for groceries.

Views: 217

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Article is worthy as your other articles. 

Nice job !

most of the copy right acts talk about fair use which has not been defined anywhere.

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp