Latest Activity

Profile IconRanjit Das, Adari P N Lalitha Devi and Manvir singh joined LIS Links
9 hours ago
Surendra Singh is attending Dr. Ashis Biswas's event
yesterday
Dr. Ashis Biswas posted an event
yesterday
Profile IconAbhishek shriyal and AMAN SAHU joined LIS Links
yesterday
Pssprakasarao updated their profile
Friday
Profile IconSwati Malvi, S.Francis Selvaraj and Siva M joined LIS Links
Thursday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a blog post
Wednesday
Dr.Stephen.G was featured
Tuesday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Tuesday
Surendra Singh left a comment for Arnica Kumari
Tuesday
Profile IconAyushi kushwaha, Shyamghan Nayak, Raja Rajeshwari G and 1 more joined LIS Links
Tuesday
Profile IconRamachandran K, KASTHURI PRIYA, Ashutosh Panigrahi and 1 more joined LIS Links
Nov 16
Dr. T. Raja updated their profile
Nov 16
N.Harilakshmi posted a discussion
Nov 16
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Nov 14
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted discussions
Nov 14
Dr. Ashis Biswas posted events
Nov 14
Profile IconAshwini C, PILLI HARSHA, Uchenna Okafor and 3 more joined LIS Links
Nov 14
Dr. Ashis Biswas might attend Dr. Ashis Biswas's event
Thumbnail

RESCOMM 2025: Research Communication Conclave at Ashoka University

December 17, 2025 at 9am to December 19, 2025 at 6pm
Nov 14
Parthasarathivamanan.K posted an event

International Conference at Hybrid Mode (Offline and Online)

December 12, 2025 at 9am to December 13, 2025 at 6pm
Nov 13

Opinion against minium marks for different category

I have a serious objection towards the cut off mark essential for the General category of students who write the UGC exam. To decide a candidate if he has passed or failed in the UGC exam the differentiation in the marks is not acceptable. The eligibility to write UGC has a differentiation in marks which I do not object. But to decide if I have passed or failed in UGC has been declared with different marks for different category, which is very undigestable.Kindly consider and make an equal assessment for all categories. This is my personal opinion which i consider is essential for the future development of our country's education system.

Views: 1690

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

I too agreed with you Sir

I also belongs to OBC Category.I Have 61% in NET Exam, But I Filled my Form in Gen Category...Why? I Dont want to Hurt any Community, But I am Totaly Disagree with UGC Criteria for Qualifying UGC/NET Exam at different lavels. This system is Totaly wrong. I Want to say Much More on This Topic but there is No Use to Reading a book to a Buffalo. I Just Want to say that in India There are so many programmes started to get a tallent, like (DID, Sa Re Ga Ma Pa, Indian Idol, Sur Kshetra, and so on , Why they can't take desicion category wise, why they are in search of a talented singer or dancer. “Biology gives you a brain. Life turns it into a mind.” " God Gives us same Mind ,No Mind is Poor by Birth nor different by Race , Religion, Sex or Age"The purpose of education is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

You are right Ashok, there is no use in blowing BANSUREE here.

Today's  World's Greatest Personalities are on Peak Due to There Talent not due to their Religion, Race and Sex. 

Yes, apart from eligibility (PG percentage) criteria for appearing the NET exam, WE ALSO DO NOT MIND THE DIFFERENCE OF FEES for prospectus and NET registration. But disparity in qualifying NET percentage, is really regrettable.
Just an anology: you give discounts for appearing 100 mts race, but general candidate has to run 100 mts and others less than 100 mts is really demotivating.

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp