Latest Activity

Profile IconMOHANA K and vandita sharma joined LIS Links
21 minutes ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
yesterday
Bidyut Bikash Kalita posted blog posts
yesterday
Profile IconBidyut Bikash Kalita, SANTHOSHA M, Pooja devi and 7 more joined LIS Links
Friday
Dr. Badan Barman posted a blog post
Friday
Praveen Kumar and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
Thursday
Praveen Kumar updated their profile
Thursday
Anandanayaka S G updated their profile
Wednesday
Dr.W.Vijaya Shoba shared their event on Facebook
Jan 24
Dr.W.Vijaya Shoba posted an event
Thumbnail

Stress and Stress Management for College Students at Kaliakkavilai

January 30, 2026 from 3pm to 4pm
Jan 22
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Jan 22
Sachin Chourasia updated their profile
Jan 20
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted an event

RRRLF-sponsored National Conference on Information Landscape: Trends and Innovations in Public and Academic Libraries (NCILTIPAL 2026) at Kasthurba Kalaiarangam, Vellalar College for Women (Autonomous), Thindal, Erode.

February 13, 2026 at 9am to February 14, 2026 at 5pm
Jan 20
Profile Iconsanthosh kumar, D.Seshu Kumari, Shruthi and 4 more joined LIS Links
Jan 20
Dr.W.Vijaya Shoba shared a profile on Facebook
Jan 12
Accutek Packaging Machine updated their profile
Jan 6
Gurwinder Singh updated their profile
Jan 5
Adithya updated their profile
Jan 5
Parthasarathivamanan.K and Pushpanjali Shriram Patil are now friends
Jan 4
Dr Shiva Kumara SU updated their profile
Jan 4

NET: court declines stay Source The Hindu 23-01-2012

NET: court declines  stay

K0CHI:  A Division Bench  of the Kerala  High Court on Tues-day declined to  stay a single

judge's  order  quashing  the University  Grants  Commission's  (UGC)'s  new  eligibility

criteria  for  the  National Eligibility  Test.

The bench comprising Chief Justice Manjula Chellur and Justice K, Vinod Chandran posted an appeal

filed by the UGC to February 5 For Final Hearing

The  Single  Judge  had also directed the UGC to grant certificates to candidates who had obtained the minimum mark  prescribed  earlier

UGC's contention

The UGC contended that the court had no right to make a declaration regarding the result of a test. The original notification had clearly' stated that the candidates should obtain minimum required marks in each paper separately.It had also been said that the qualifying criteria for Junior Research Fellowship and
eligibility for Lectureship would be decided by the UGC before the declaration of results

It was a moderation committee appointed by the UGC and consisting of senior academicians that had

rec-commended that the general, OBC (non-creamy layer) and the SC/ST candidates would be required to obtain an aggregate percentage of 65, 60 and 55 respectively in addition to the paper vise minimum Percentage as qualifying criteria the  UGC said.

Within powers
The appeal said that in order to maintain high standard in education, prescription of an aggregate percentage in an examination was well within the powers of UGC. Prescribing the Qualifying criteria by fixing an aggregate percentage could not be called change of rules in the middle of the test\. No new criterion was introduced by UGC



Views: 3138

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

but what guarantee final hearing will be on 5th fab. ek baar postponed hota hai toh postponed hamesha hote rehta hai. allah jaane kya hoga?

Tareekh pe tareekh milti rahi hai lekin insaaf nahin milta. Milti hai to sirf tareekh. Kanoon ke dalalon ne tareekh ko ek hathiyar ki tarah istemaal kiya hai - a dialogue from hindi film and comment on indian judicial system.

I must say that never loose hopes. Hum honge kamyaab ek din, man main hai vishwas pur ahai vishwaas hum honge kaamyab ek din.

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp