Latest Activity

Dr. Amit Kumar Das updated their profile
5 hours ago
saritha anumandla updated their profile
5 hours ago
Dr. Pravish Prakash updated their profile
6 hours ago
Satyajit Khan updated their profile
7 hours ago
Avinash Vinayak Shrotriya updated their profile
7 hours ago
Tabasum Begum(Nilu) and Mhuammad Rafiq Akhtar are now friends
7 hours ago
Mahadev Ghosh and Krishna kumar yadav are now friends
8 hours ago
UZAIR AHMAD updated their profile
8 hours ago
Profile IconMahadev Ghosh, Arunima Giri and allauddin joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
9 hours ago
Mahadev Ghosh updated their profile
9 hours ago
Devendra Naik updated their profile
10 hours ago
VEINEITHEM GENA updated their profile
11 hours ago
Dr. Swati Yogesh Mate updated their profile
12 hours ago
Bedanga Ranjan Bora updated their profile
12 hours ago
Bedanga Ranjan Bora and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
12 hours ago
Sumit Sundar Ray updated their profile
12 hours ago
Dr Bhimarayanagouda patil updated their profile
12 hours ago
Dr. Damodar Dashrath Waghmare updated their profile
12 hours ago
Rajesh Kumar Sinha updated their profile
13 hours ago
Jeevarajan.M updated their profile
13 hours ago

Opinion against minium marks for different category

I have a serious objection towards the cut off mark essential for the General category of students who write the UGC exam. To decide a candidate if he has passed or failed in the UGC exam the differentiation in the marks is not acceptable. The eligibility to write UGC has a differentiation in marks which I do not object. But to decide if I have passed or failed in UGC has been declared with different marks for different category, which is very undigestable.Kindly consider and make an equal assessment for all categories. This is my personal opinion which i consider is essential for the future development of our country's education system.

Views: 1884

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

I too agreed with you Sir

I also belongs to OBC Category.I Have 61% in NET Exam, But I Filled my Form in Gen Category...Why? I Dont want to Hurt any Community, But I am Totaly Disagree with UGC Criteria for Qualifying UGC/NET Exam at different lavels. This system is Totaly wrong. I Want to say Much More on This Topic but there is No Use to Reading a book to a Buffalo. I Just Want to say that in India There are so many programmes started to get a tallent, like (DID, Sa Re Ga Ma Pa, Indian Idol, Sur Kshetra, and so on , Why they can't take desicion category wise, why they are in search of a talented singer or dancer. “Biology gives you a brain. Life turns it into a mind.” " God Gives us same Mind ,No Mind is Poor by Birth nor different by Race , Religion, Sex or Age"The purpose of education is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

You are right Ashok, there is no use in blowing BANSUREE here.

Today's  World's Greatest Personalities are on Peak Due to There Talent not due to their Religion, Race and Sex. 

Yes, apart from eligibility (PG percentage) criteria for appearing the NET exam, WE ALSO DO NOT MIND THE DIFFERENCE OF FEES for prospectus and NET registration. But disparity in qualifying NET percentage, is really regrettable.
Just an anology: you give discounts for appearing 100 mts race, but general candidate has to run 100 mts and others less than 100 mts is really demotivating.

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp