LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

Pramod kumar updated their profile
yesterday
Manmeet Kaur updated their profile
Monday
MEDARIKA SYIEM updated their profile
Monday
Namita Bayan updated their profile
Saturday
Paojathang Haokip left a comment for paojangul misao
Saturday
srikanth updated their profile
Sep 26
Dola Ghosh might attend Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN's event
Sep 24
Mahendra Singh and Navnit Patel are now friends
Sep 24
Rajbir Singh and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
Sep 23
Santosh Kumar Kori is now friends with DEVENDER and pankaj mishra
Sep 18
Santosh Kumar Kori is attending neema shukla's event
Thumbnail

International Conference on Libraries and Emerging Technologies for Smart Knowledge Ecosystems (ICLET 2025), at Jaipur,Rajasthan

November 14, 2025 at 9am to November 15, 2025 at 6pm
Sep 18
Nayana Nair updated their profile
Sep 18
PRASANNA R updated their profile
Sep 14
Kanika sharma might attend Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN's event
Sep 12
Dr. Asha Peter updated their profile
Sep 10
Dr. Asha Peter is now friends with ANILKUMAR.R and VIJAYAKUMAR V
Sep 10
jai prakash kumar updated their profile
Sep 9
Saradhambal V updated their profile
Sep 7
neema shukla updated their profile
Sep 7
Dr. Bhakti Gala and KUMAR RAJ are now friends
Sep 6

If 3 candidate is selected in a particular subject, than what is 15% of 3 candidate ? Ans. is 3*15/100=0.45 i.e. no candidate will pass in a particular subject even if all the 3 candidate scores 100% marks in a particular subject. It is possible because some subjects are very very hard.

Views: 1398

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

It is not statistical error.  You are making an error in understanding the UGC notification.  First of all, such a probability is well nigh impossible. Secondly, even if you assume only 3 candidates are selected or are clearing the demarcation then there shall be no need to filter the first 15% all 3  are well within first 15% and hence by default will pass the examination.

I understood very well. I m jst discussing statistical error.....I accept it but if UGC really do like this what will you do ? They are legally correct. After all you are not Prof. V. Prakash, you have no authority to take decision.

The matter cannot simply be left to the whims and fancies of V.Prakash or any XYZ for that matter.  You are no judge either, to pronounce them "legally correct".  In such a situation people will force institutions for course corrections if need be.  Dont worry about that.

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop