LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

Bristy Handique updated their profile
4 hours ago
meghabat singh updated their profile
11 hours ago
Elukoti Bhosle updated their profile
14 hours ago
DEVI SHANKAR DINGARA updated their profile
yesterday
ASHUTOSH KAG updated their profile
Thursday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted discussions
Thursday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Thursday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN is now friends with Ramesh Kumar and Suraj Morya
Thursday
Archanagita Saikia posted a discussion
Thursday
Manju Meerwal joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Thursday
Dr. O Seshaiaih posted a discussion
Thursday
Dr. A. Madhava Rao posted an event

Online-Lecture on "AI Tools for Academic Research Writing and Publishing" at Microsoft Teams (Online)

August 4, 2025 from 2pm to 4pm
Thursday
Dr. Badan Barman posted a blog post
Thursday
MANJEET KHATRI posted a blog post
Thursday
Profile IconRadhika J, Mohan, RP Raaj and 36 more joined LIS Links
Thursday
MANJEET KHATRI updated their profile
Wednesday
DEVI SHANKAR DINGARA shared a profile on Facebook
Tuesday
Dr.Stephen.G replied to Dr.Stephen.G's discussion Call for Papers – ICDIASLS-2025
Jul 13
Dr.Stephen.G posted a discussion
Jul 13
CHETAN RAVAL updated their profile
Jul 11

If 3 candidate is selected in a particular subject, than what is 15% of 3 candidate ? Ans. is 3*15/100=0.45 i.e. no candidate will pass in a particular subject even if all the 3 candidate scores 100% marks in a particular subject. It is possible because some subjects are very very hard.

Facebook

Views: 1392

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

It is not statistical error.  You are making an error in understanding the UGC notification.  First of all, such a probability is well nigh impossible. Secondly, even if you assume only 3 candidates are selected or are clearing the demarcation then there shall be no need to filter the first 15% all 3  are well within first 15% and hence by default will pass the examination.

I understood very well. I m jst discussing statistical error.....I accept it but if UGC really do like this what will you do ? They are legally correct. After all you are not Prof. V. Prakash, you have no authority to take decision.

The matter cannot simply be left to the whims and fancies of V.Prakash or any XYZ for that matter.  You are no judge either, to pronounce them "legally correct".  In such a situation people will force institutions for course corrections if need be.  Dont worry about that.

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop