LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

meghabat singh updated their profile
47 minutes ago
Elukoti Bhosle updated their profile
4 hours ago
DEVI SHANKAR DINGARA updated their profile
yesterday
ASHUTOSH KAG updated their profile
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted discussions
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN is now friends with Ramesh Kumar and Suraj Morya
yesterday
Archanagita Saikia posted a discussion
yesterday
Manju Meerwal joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
yesterday
Dr. O Seshaiaih posted a discussion
Thursday
Dr. A. Madhava Rao posted an event

Online-Lecture on "AI Tools for Academic Research Writing and Publishing" at Microsoft Teams (Online)

August 4, 2025 from 2pm to 4pm
Thursday
Dr. Badan Barman posted a blog post
Thursday
MANJEET KHATRI posted a blog post
Thursday
Profile IconRadhika J, Mohan, RP Raaj and 36 more joined LIS Links
Thursday
MANJEET KHATRI updated their profile
Wednesday
DEVI SHANKAR DINGARA shared a profile on Facebook
Tuesday
Dr.Stephen.G replied to Dr.Stephen.G's discussion Call for Papers – ICDIASLS-2025
Sunday
Dr.Stephen.G posted a discussion
Sunday
CHETAN RAVAL updated their profile
Jul 11
Bilal Rabbani is now friends with Millan Krushna Dutta and Mhuammad Rafiq Akhtar
Jul 10

Copyright isn't dead just because we're not willing to let it regulate us

Copyright isn't dead just because we're not willing to let it regulate us

March 24, 2012 - 4:21pm — Blake

The "copy" in copyright is there because of an accident of history: once upon a time, to "copy" was to do something industrial. Copying required physical plant, employees, premises, trading. While not everything industrial could be reduced to "copying," all copying was presumptively industrial. There were ways of non-industrially copying things – a sculptor could copy another sculptor's work by application of her eye and hand and chisel, a writer could dip his quill and set out the lines of another writer – but it wasn't really necessary to explicitly declare that this wasn't the kind of thing regulated by copyright. Such activity was almost always invisible to rights-holders, and even if an individual work happened to rise to the attention of a rights-holder, he would seem like a bit of a fool trying to apply industrial rules to individual actors. It's like asking your neighbours to register as a bed and breakfast because they've got guests in for the weekend who've chipped in for groceries.

Views: 208

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Article is worthy as your other articles. 

Nice job !

most of the copy right acts talk about fair use which has not been defined anywhere.

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop