LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

Elukoti Bhosle updated their profile
38 minutes ago
DEVI SHANKAR DINGARA updated their profile
yesterday
ASHUTOSH KAG updated their profile
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted discussions
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN is now friends with Ramesh Kumar and Suraj Morya
yesterday
Archanagita Saikia posted a discussion
yesterday
Manju Meerwal joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
yesterday
Dr. O Seshaiaih posted a discussion
yesterday
Dr. A. Madhava Rao posted an event

Online-Lecture on "AI Tools for Academic Research Writing and Publishing" at Microsoft Teams (Online)

August 4, 2025 from 2pm to 4pm
yesterday
Dr. Badan Barman posted a blog post
yesterday
MANJEET KHATRI posted a blog post
yesterday
Profile IconRadhika J, Mohan, RP Raaj and 36 more joined LIS Links
yesterday
MANJEET KHATRI updated their profile
Wednesday
DEVI SHANKAR DINGARA shared a profile on Facebook
Tuesday
Dr.Stephen.G replied to Dr.Stephen.G's discussion Call for Papers – ICDIASLS-2025
Sunday
Dr.Stephen.G posted a discussion
Sunday
CHETAN RAVAL updated their profile
Jul 11
Bilal Rabbani is now friends with Millan Krushna Dutta and Mhuammad Rafiq Akhtar
Jul 10
Vinod Kumar Jain posted a blog post
Jul 9

We would like to purchase Plagiarism checking software for our private university for checking PhD. scholar works. Kindly suggest best software

Facebook

Views: 873

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear 

It is Turnitin we are using the same.

Urkund plagiarism software

iThanticate, VeriGuide,The Plagiarism Checker, See Sources, Plag Tracker, PlagScan, Plagium, Plagiarisma, Plagiarism Detector, Plagiarism Detect, Plagiarism Checker X, Attributor, Copyscape, Crosscheck, Ephorus, Google, eTBLAST, CopyTracker etc.,

Contact Inflibnet centre for URKUND

All of us should understand that it is dangerous to depend on the plagiarism detection tools. They match only characters and words, but not concepts. I can challenge that if you give me a work and allow me 15 minutes, I can do a few changes in the file and no tool can detect it. These tools have many limitations. Use of human intelligence with some help from these tools will really works. We can note that most of the reputed journals never use these tools, rather use reviewers' knowledge on the content. Machine learning based software are now used by people to prepare a paper and these detection tools fail to detect such machine-produced papers. We have hundreds of illustrations to show the failure of these plagiarism detection tools. Hence most of the senior scientists say clearly - plagiarism detection is a misnomer!

Many thanks Ms.Saba Sarasvdy for your open remarks highlighting the differences among Words, Characters and Concepts.
Best Wishes,

Siddhartha S. Ray, Calcutta

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop