Latest Activity

M S M Shiham updated their profile
7 hours ago
Sumedha Singh posted an event
9 hours ago
Chinmayee Bhange posted events
9 hours ago
Sumedha Singh posted a discussion
9 hours ago
Shravan Kumar Suppala updated their profile
10 hours ago
Dr. Vikram Kr. Sharma updated their profile
10 hours ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
10 hours ago
Bonala Kondal updated their profile
11 hours ago
Bonala Kondal and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
11 hours ago
sonali choudhury updated their profile
11 hours ago
Medha Rajesh Mangurkar updated their profile
13 hours ago
vasudev tiwari updated their profile
23 hours ago
Monali Mitra Paladhi updated their profile
yesterday
Dr. Mahendra Patel updated their profile
yesterday
Rahul chetri updated their profile
yesterday
Dr.Stephen.G is now friends with CHANDRASEKAR M and Mahadev Ghosh
yesterday
Dr.Stephen.G posted a discussion
yesterday
Vinay Kumar updated their profile
yesterday
MANGESH RAMRAO BHITRE updated their profile
yesterday
AYYAPPAN .Z updated their profile
yesterday

We would like to purchase Plagiarism checking software for our private university for checking PhD. scholar works. Kindly suggest best software

Views: 935

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear 

It is Turnitin we are using the same.

Urkund plagiarism software

iThanticate, VeriGuide,The Plagiarism Checker, See Sources, Plag Tracker, PlagScan, Plagium, Plagiarisma, Plagiarism Detector, Plagiarism Detect, Plagiarism Checker X, Attributor, Copyscape, Crosscheck, Ephorus, Google, eTBLAST, CopyTracker etc.,

Contact Inflibnet centre for URKUND

All of us should understand that it is dangerous to depend on the plagiarism detection tools. They match only characters and words, but not concepts. I can challenge that if you give me a work and allow me 15 minutes, I can do a few changes in the file and no tool can detect it. These tools have many limitations. Use of human intelligence with some help from these tools will really works. We can note that most of the reputed journals never use these tools, rather use reviewers' knowledge on the content. Machine learning based software are now used by people to prepare a paper and these detection tools fail to detect such machine-produced papers. We have hundreds of illustrations to show the failure of these plagiarism detection tools. Hence most of the senior scientists say clearly - plagiarism detection is a misnomer!

Many thanks Ms.Saba Sarasvdy for your open remarks highlighting the differences among Words, Characters and Concepts.
Best Wishes,

Siddhartha S. Ray, Calcutta

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp