LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Members

Latest Activity

Dr Saurabh Lohia updated their profile
Tuesday
Sudheer Singh is attending Anand A Jha (PhD)'s event

I-KOAL 2024 at MIT WPU

February 15, 2024 to February 16, 2024
Apr 10
Anil Kumar Jharotia updated their profile
Apr 9
Dr. Kundan Jha updated their profile
Apr 8

We would like to purchase Plagiarism checking software for our private university for checking PhD. scholar works. Kindly suggest best software

Views: 779

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear 

It is Turnitin we are using the same.

Urkund plagiarism software

iThanticate, VeriGuide,The Plagiarism Checker, See Sources, Plag Tracker, PlagScan, Plagium, Plagiarisma, Plagiarism Detector, Plagiarism Detect, Plagiarism Checker X, Attributor, Copyscape, Crosscheck, Ephorus, Google, eTBLAST, CopyTracker etc.,

Contact Inflibnet centre for URKUND

All of us should understand that it is dangerous to depend on the plagiarism detection tools. They match only characters and words, but not concepts. I can challenge that if you give me a work and allow me 15 minutes, I can do a few changes in the file and no tool can detect it. These tools have many limitations. Use of human intelligence with some help from these tools will really works. We can note that most of the reputed journals never use these tools, rather use reviewers' knowledge on the content. Machine learning based software are now used by people to prepare a paper and these detection tools fail to detect such machine-produced papers. We have hundreds of illustrations to show the failure of these plagiarism detection tools. Hence most of the senior scientists say clearly - plagiarism detection is a misnomer!

Many thanks Ms.Saba Sarasvdy for your open remarks highlighting the differences among Words, Characters and Concepts.
Best Wishes,

Siddhartha S. Ray, Calcutta

RSS

© 2024   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop