LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

Kanika sharma might attend Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN's event
17 hours ago
Dr. Asha Peter updated their profile
Thursday
Dr. Asha Peter is now friends with ANILKUMAR.R, Dr. Badan Barman and VIJAYAKUMAR V
Thursday
jai prakash kumar updated their profile
Wednesday
Saradhambal V updated their profile
Monday
neema shukla updated their profile
Monday
Dr. Bhakti Gala and KUMAR RAJ are now friends
Sep 6
Sebastine Robert updated their profile
Sep 3
MAYUR JAIN left a comment for Dev prajapati
Sep 2
Shivaganga salotagi updated their profile
Aug 30
Ankit Jaiswal updated their profile
Aug 26
S RAVI posted a status
Aug 24
S RAVI posted a status
""Call for Chapter Contribution in Editorial Book "…"
Aug 24
M Vineesh Kumar joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Aug 15
Dr. REKHRAJ SAHU updated their profile
Aug 15
Manju Meerwal updated their profile
Aug 13
dibyajyoti patgiri and BITUPON DOLEY are now friends
Aug 11
preeti verma updated their profile
Aug 11
preeti verma is now friends with Mohit Garg and Pramod S. Kerkar
Aug 11
KAJAL KUMARI RAO shared a profile on Facebook
Aug 10

We would like to purchase Plagiarism checking software for our private university for checking PhD. scholar works. Kindly suggest best software

Views: 882

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear 

It is Turnitin we are using the same.

Urkund plagiarism software

iThanticate, VeriGuide,The Plagiarism Checker, See Sources, Plag Tracker, PlagScan, Plagium, Plagiarisma, Plagiarism Detector, Plagiarism Detect, Plagiarism Checker X, Attributor, Copyscape, Crosscheck, Ephorus, Google, eTBLAST, CopyTracker etc.,

Contact Inflibnet centre for URKUND

All of us should understand that it is dangerous to depend on the plagiarism detection tools. They match only characters and words, but not concepts. I can challenge that if you give me a work and allow me 15 minutes, I can do a few changes in the file and no tool can detect it. These tools have many limitations. Use of human intelligence with some help from these tools will really works. We can note that most of the reputed journals never use these tools, rather use reviewers' knowledge on the content. Machine learning based software are now used by people to prepare a paper and these detection tools fail to detect such machine-produced papers. We have hundreds of illustrations to show the failure of these plagiarism detection tools. Hence most of the senior scientists say clearly - plagiarism detection is a misnomer!

Many thanks Ms.Saba Sarasvdy for your open remarks highlighting the differences among Words, Characters and Concepts.
Best Wishes,

Siddhartha S. Ray, Calcutta

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop