Latest Activity

Oriental Library Association shared their discussion on Facebook
yesterday
Sumit Sundar Ray updated their profile
Thursday
Alka Gohel posted a discussion
Wednesday
Anna Poorani posted a blog post
Wednesday
Manoj Kumar posted a blog post
Wednesday
Mr. Ambaresh H posted a blog post
Wednesday
Anna Kaushik posted a discussion
Wednesday
Gopalji updated their profile
Tuesday
Anna Poorani updated their profile
Monday
Anna Poorani is now friends with Sivaprakasam, Dr.K.Murugan and Dr. Badan Barman
Monday
Oriental Library Association updated their profile
Apr 9
Chetan Hegde M updated their profile
Apr 9
AREPALLI MADHAVI joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Apr 7
Dr.P.KRISHNAN updated their profile
Apr 7
Dhruven Ponkiya updated their profile
Mar 30
sangeeta sharma is attending Dr. Shamim Aktar Munshi's event
Mar 28
Kanika sharma and Ankit Jaiswal are now friends
Mar 27
Nagendra N updated their profile
Mar 25
Pallavi Sushant Sapkal and S. Jaffer Basha are now friends
Mar 22
Dr. Divyanshu Gupta updated their profile
Mar 20

Rectification of Anomaly in U.G.C. Regulation 2010; Granting Study Leave with Pay for Acquiring Ph.D. while in Service for “College Librarians”: Letter from COLNI

Rectification of Anomaly in U.G.C. Regulation 2010; Granting Study Leave with Pay for Acquiring Ph.D. while in Service for “College Librarians”: Letter from Confederation of Librarians’ Association of Northern India (COLNI)
Rectification of Anomaly in U.G.C. Regulation 2010; Granting Study Leave with Pay for Acquiring Ph.D. while in Service for “College Librarians”: Letter from Confederation of Librarians’ Association of Northern India (COLNI)

Views: 2260

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Respected sir

Also consider following demands of college librarian:

Rectification in the UGC norms of API for College Librarian in Appendix III ย ย 

ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย  Table VII inย  the UGC guidelines dated 30.6.2010.

Sir,

ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย  UGC issued guidelines on 30.6.2010 for the minimum point norms of the APIs for the promotionย  of College Teachers, Collegeย  Director of Physical Education and College Librarian. Sir , there is a mistake in the above mentioned table inย  category III Research and Academic contribution for promotion of College Librarian from stage 1 to stage 2, stage 2 to stage 3 and stage 3 to stage 4 as follows:

IV

Research and Academic Contribution (Category III) โ€“ Minimum Annual Score Required โ€“ to be assessed cumulatively

5/Year

ย 

(40 assessment period)

10/Year

ย 

(100 assessment period)

15/ Year

ย 

(90 assessment period)

ย 

Sir, the assessment period for promotion from stage 1 to stage 2 is minimum 4 year instead of 40/assessment period minimum score should have been 20/assessment period @ 5/year (as mentioned in case of corresponding College Teachers and College Director of Physical education). The assessment period for promotion from stage 2 to stage 3 is 5 year instead of 100/assessment period minimum score should have been 50/assessment period @ 10/year (as mentioned in case of corresponding College Teachers and College Director of Physical Education). Similarly the assessment period for promotion from stage 3 to stage 4 is 3 year instead of 90/assessment period minimum score should have been 45/assessment period @ 15/year.

Attachments:

Respected sir

Also consider following demands of college librarian:

Rectification in the UGC norms of API for College Librarian in Appendix III

Table VII in the UGC guidelines dated 30.6.2010.

Sir,

UGC issued guidelines on 30.6.2010 for the minimum point norms of the APIs for the promotion of College Teachers, College Director of Physical Education and College Librarian. Sir , there is a mistake in the above mentioned table in category III Research and Academic contribution for promotion of College Librarian from stage 1 to stage 2, stage 2 to stage 3 and stage 3 to stage 4 as follows:

IV

Research and Academic Contribution (Category III) โ€“ Minimum Annual Score Required โ€“ to be assessed cumulatively

5/Year

(40 assessment period)

10/Year

(100 assessment period)

15/ Year

(90 assessment period)

Sir, the assessment period for promotion from stage 1 to stage 2 is minimum 4 year instead of 40/assessment period minimum score should have been 20/assessment period @ 5/year (as mentioned in case of corresponding College Teachers and College Director of Physical education). The assessment period for promotion from stage 2 to stage 3 is 5 year instead of 100/assessment period minimum score should have been 50/assessment period @ 10/year (as mentioned in case of corresponding College Teachers and College Director of Physical Education). Similarly the assessment period for promotion from stage 3 to stage 4 is 3 year instead of 90/assessment period minimum score should have been 45/assessment period @ 15/year.

Attachments:

RSS

ยฉ 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp