Latest Activity

Oriental Library Association updated their profile
yesterday
Chetan Hegde M updated their profile
Thursday
AREPALLI MADHAVI joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Wednesday
Dr.P.KRISHNAN updated their profile
Wednesday
Dhruven Ponkiya updated their profile
Mar 30
sangeeta sharma is attending Dr. Shamim Aktar Munshi's event
Mar 28
Kanika sharma and Ankit Jaiswal are now friends
Mar 27
Nagendra N updated their profile
Mar 25
Pallavi Sushant Sapkal and S. Jaffer Basha are now friends
Mar 22
Dr. Divyanshu Gupta updated their profile
Mar 20
Nilesh and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
Mar 19
Dr. Gulshan Kumar Sachdeva updated their profile
Mar 17
Dr. Gulshan Kumar Sachdeva and sandeep shukla are now friends
Mar 17
Devendra Parker joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Mar 17
Manoj Kumar updated their profile
Mar 15
Ranjansen Shende updated their profile
Mar 15
Ku. Dipti Lodwal joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Mar 13
Ku. Dipti Lodwal joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Mar 13
Ku. Dipti Lodwal left a comment for Arun kumar Sirla
Mar 13
Ku. Dipti Lodwal left a comment for Vikrant Dubey
Mar 13

Rules Can’t be Introduced Just Before Exam Results: HC

DC | Shashiprasad S.M. | 04th Aug 2013

Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court has held that regulations cannot be introduced at the fag end of an examination process or just before or at the time of announcement of results.

The court passed the order while quashing the category-wise qualifying criteria for eligibility for lecturersโ€™ posts for the UGC NET last year.

Justice Ashok B. Hinchigeri passed the order recently, while allowing two petitions challenging action by the University Grants Commissยญion, which had changed the eligibility criteria for general category candidates at the time of announcing the results for exams held in June 2012.

A 36-year-old lecturer and an advocate, postgraduates in law from Mysore University, had appeared for the National Eligibility Test (NET) for the junior research fellowship and lecturer posts.

The eligibility criteria for the post of lectureship for the candidates from general category was initially set at 40% in paper-I, 40% in paper-II and 50% in paper-III. As per the notification issued by the UGC NET Bureau, both the petitioners had obtained the minimum qualifying percentage in all the three papers.

But the NET Bureau, at the time of announcing the results, raised the minimum qualifying percentage to aggregate 65 for the candidates from general category, prompting the two petitioners to approach the court.

The counsel for the petitioners submitted that the terms and conditions at the time of calling for the applications govern the entire process of the test, including the fixing of the minimum marks and the announcement of results.

ย โ€œMidway, the minimum qualifying percentage cannot be varied to the disadvantage of the candidates,โ€ the advocate argued, placing before the court an order of the Kerala High Court quashing the upward revision of minimum qualifying percentage.

The court ordered: โ€œThe aggregate 65 as minimum qualifying percentage is quashed. It is declared that the petitioners have acquired the eligibility criteria for lectureship, if they have indeed secured 40 per cent in paper โ€“ I, 40 per cent in paper โ€“ II and 50 per cent in paper โ€“ III or more.โ€ The court also directed the UGC to issue the eligibility certificate to the petitioners before August 16.ย 

Views: 446

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

what happens next, will the UGC give the certificate or we need to wait for a another year or so... while Supreme Court gives its verdict.ย 

Congratulations!!!!!!!!!!

RSS

ยฉ 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp