Latest Activity

A.Mahesh left a comment for Dr. Badan Barman
8 hours ago
Dr. N K Pachauri posted a discussion
8 hours ago
A.Mahesh posted a blog post
8 hours ago
Profile IconKatie Rodgerson, Swapna Khandekar, Ajay parmar and 9 more joined LIS Links
8 hours ago
Kirtisharma updated their profile
Saturday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Friday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted events
Friday
Abhishek Pingale updated their profile
Friday
Noor Aziz and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
Thursday
Profile IconAman Pathe, Dhritima Kakati, Dr. Priyanka Suryavanshi and 3 more joined LIS Links
Thursday
Devendra Singh Kotal updated their profile
Thursday
Profile IconDevendra Singh Kotal, MANI THALAPATHI, Sanjeev Kumar and 2 more joined LIS Links
Feb 3
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted events
Feb 3
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Feb 3
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Feb 3
Dr. O Seshaiaih posted a discussion
Feb 3
Dr .K.SANGEETHA updated their profile
Feb 3
Bidyut Bikash Kalita posted a blog post
Feb 2
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a blog post
Feb 2
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Feb 2
Sir,
Here is an appeal to you from Lislink forum/ student community to reconsider the result of Net June '12 as we have seen many anomally in the process and criteria of publishing the Net result which does not match the prescribed criteria ...Sir,We want your intervention to stop these types of anomaly so that we will stop to go to the Courts for true Judgement. Please consider the Kerala High Court judgement and give us the result as we are not putting down the standard of Net after qualifying 60+% in PG and basic criteria of Net are satandard enough. This is not getting a Job but only a gate way to apply for Job in this age of Jobless and competitive, rude, biased society.

Faults are as follows:-
 

The criteria fixed by ugc in supplementary result is wrong .The change only for the general category students butOBC and SC/ST category students did not get the benefits of this criteria .I share the information to my lawyer .ugc again n trap.The suplimentry result criteria against obc and sc /st category and Ugc violats the rule of equality.If ugc delete wrong/unevaluated questions then same effect/change comes in other category also.


In Library and information science cut off june 2012 was General :63.43 % OBC : 60% SC/ST :55%


How its possible the reduction in percentage of marks only for general category...???


Same questions but different marks awarded ????? ugc check the quantity only; not quality .


In some other subjects the general category have 65 % but in other categories a reduction in percentage of marks. Mathili (Sub Code: 18) ---------------------General : 65.00% but for SC/ST: 54.86 % Women Studies (Sub Code: 74)--------General : 65.00% but for SC/ST: 52.57 % Prakrit (Sub Code: 91)---------------------- General: 65.00% but for SC/ST: 54.86 %

Library and information science June 2012 cut off

General 63.43 % Qualified 504

OBC 60% Qualified 352

PWD 55% Qualified 18

SC/ST 55% Qualified 294

There is a lot of dough about to create such type of ((subject wise & category wise)) criteria combining all three papers. like mass communication & journalism, (Sub Code 63)

Gen. Category. 45.71%

OBC Category. 45.14%

Sub Code 89 (Envi. Sc.)

Gen Cat. 56.57%

OBC Cat. 54.06%

PWD Cat. 52.57%

SC/ST Cat. 52%, and so on in all subjects have their own different Cut Off Subject Wise & Category Wise. Please you may check also above Slides provided by Jomy Jose after getting from UGC under RTI Act 2005.

In the first Result the cut off was:

GEN. 65%

OBC. 60%

SC/ST/PWD. 55%

the above cut off was common for all Subjects & Categories given above.

But for Supplementary Result:

the UGC prepared Subject Wise & Category Wise Criteria in a different way ??????? think and rethink again and again on this issue and be active....................

After declaration of revised results we should lodge the case on UGC of time wasting / money wasting / mentally harassment case.

Sir, We want your intervention to stop this type of anomally so that we will stop to go to the Courts for true Judgement. Please consider the Kerala High Court judgement and give us the result as we are not putting down the standard of Net after qualifying 60+% in PG and basic criteria of Net are satandard enough. This is not getting a Job but only a gate way to apply for Job in this age of Jobless and competitive society. Thanking you.

Faithfully

Prosenjit Dey

Views: 1163

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

yes ,very good.It is o.k

For reserved category result of library science is not given in supplementary result and UGC have violated the rules of equality and they have given result only for general category up to 63.49 percent.

Dear LIS friends...

What is the real fact of the UGC NET june 2012?

Please give correct information or discontinue these discussions

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp