Latest Activity

Dr.Stephen.G was featured
13 hours ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
14 hours ago
Surendra Singh left a comment for Arnica Kumari
15 hours ago
Profile IconAyushi kushwaha, Shyamghan Nayak, Raja Rajeshwari G and 1 more joined LIS Links
18 hours ago
Profile IconRamachandran K, KASTHURI PRIYA, Ashutosh Panigrahi and 1 more joined LIS Links
yesterday
Dr. T. Raja updated their profile
yesterday
N.Harilakshmi posted a discussion
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Saturday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted discussions
Saturday
Dr. Ashis Biswas posted events
Saturday
Profile IconAshwini C, PILLI HARSHA, Uchenna Okafor and 3 more joined LIS Links
Saturday
Dr. Ashis Biswas might attend Dr. Ashis Biswas's event
Thumbnail

RESCOMM 2025: Research Communication Conclave at Ashoka University

December 17, 2025 at 9am to December 19, 2025 at 6pm
Friday
Parthasarathivamanan.K posted an event

International Conference at Hybrid Mode (Offline and Online)

December 12, 2025 at 9am to December 13, 2025 at 6pm
Friday
Dr. Ashis Biswas updated their profile
Nov 12
KUNAL GAURAV updated their profile
Nov 12
Profile IconRajasri Jayavel, SHEEBA S, MD NEYAZ HUSSAIN and 1 more joined LIS Links
Nov 11
A. A. T. Hasan posted a discussion
Nov 9
SWAPNA SOURAV is now a member of LIS Links
Nov 9
Dr. Yogesh Subhashrao Kantale updated their profile
Nov 8
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Nov 7

 NET JUNE 2012

 WILL THE KERALA COURT DECISION BE VALID FOR ALL SUCH CANDIDATES ALL OVER INDIA?

IT SHOULD BE SO UNIVERSALLY FOR ALL .

THOSE CANDITATES WHO HAD SCORED THE MINIMUM QUALIFYING MARKS AS WAS DECLARED BY UGC BEFORE THE CHANGE IN THE QUALIFYING CRITERIA MUST UNITE.

HOW?

I AM BALARAM FROM KOLKATA.

 

Views: 2289

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Yes, we should fight jointly. I think we must PIL instead of file petitions in states.

PIL???

contact me. with mail.

No need to file writ petition. Bc.... 

 

SC relief to NET candidates

PUNE: In a relief to thousands of aspirants taking the national eligibility test (NET), the UGC has withdrawn its decision to increase the cut-off marks for clearing the NET, following a Supreme Court order on Friday. The UGC had increased the eligibility score by 15% without notice.

The national educational testing bureau of the UGC conducts the NET for determining the eligibility for lectureship and for awarding junior research fellowship to ensure minimum standards for the entrants in the teaching profession and research. The NET is conducted in June and December every year.

The UGC, however, made several changes in the June 2012 exam, including increasing the cut-off marks. The candidates learnt about the changes only when the UGC announced it a day after announcing the results of the exam on September 18.

As per the initial notification, candidates belonging to the SC/ST sections needed 35, 35, and 60 marks respectively for qualifying papers 1, 2 and 3. The marks to be obtained by the OBCs were set as 35, 35, and 68 and for those belonging to the general category it was 40, 40, and 75. But, when the results were announced, candidates who would've been eligible as per the initial criteria failed to qualify.

As per the new criteria, the percentage of marks to be scored by candidates belonging to different categories has been increased by 15%.

This made several students file an affidavit with the SC against the UGC regarding change in norms. On Friday, the SC issued an order saying that the UGC's decision was invalid as it did not follow the exam policy in announcing the changes in cut-offs and that, too, in such a short period of time. An official at the University of Pune that conducts the NET exam said, "The SC decision is valid for all candidates who sat for the June 2012 examinations. The old cut-offs will be considered and new results will be announced."

 

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/entrance-exams/SC...

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop