Latest Activity

Abhishek Chourasiya updated their profile
yesterday
Profile IconSweety Angelirie Kharumnuid and Alka Solanki joined LIS Links
yesterday
Dr. SUDHI S VIJAYAN posted an event
yesterday
A.Mahesh left a comment for Dr. Badan Barman
Tuesday
Dr. N K Pachauri posted a discussion
Tuesday
A.Mahesh posted a blog post
Tuesday
Profile IconKatie Rodgerson, Swapna Khandekar, Ajay parmar and 9 more joined LIS Links
Tuesday
Kirtisharma updated their profile
Feb 6
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Feb 5
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted events
Feb 5
Abhishek Pingale updated their profile
Feb 5
Noor Aziz and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
Feb 5
Profile IconAman Pathe, Dhritima Kakati, Dr. Priyanka Suryavanshi and 3 more joined LIS Links
Feb 4
Devendra Singh Kotal updated their profile
Feb 4
Profile IconDevendra Singh Kotal, MANI THALAPATHI, Sanjeev Kumar and 2 more joined LIS Links
Feb 3
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted events
Feb 3
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Feb 3
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Feb 3
Dr. O Seshaiaih posted a discussion
Feb 3
Dr .K.SANGEETHA updated their profile
Feb 3

1. What is Solomon four group design?

2. Jubilee Project?

 

Views: 6374

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Jubilee project is related to User studies.

Solomon Four Group Design

This design is a combination of the pretest-posttest control group design and the posttest only control group design.  It is as good at controlling threats to internal and external validity as the posttest only control group design, but superior to that design with respect to statistical conclusion validity.  However, it gains that advantage at the cost of considerably greater expense and effort in the collection and analysis of the data.

            To test the hypothesis of no testing by treatment interaction, one could arrange all four groups’ posttest scores into a 2 x 2 factorial ANOVA design, (pretested or not) X (given the experimental treatment or not).  A significant interaction would indicate that the simple main effect of the treatment among those that were pretested was not the same as the simple main effect of the treatment among those that were not pretested.  The main effect of pretesting and the main effect of the treatment could also be assessed with such an ANOVA.  If there existed a significant testing by treatment interaction, one could test the simple main effect of the treatment for the pretested subjects and for the not pretested subjects.  One might also want to analyze the data from the pretest-posttest control group part of the design with those techniques which are appropriate for such a design (such as ANCOV on the posttest scores using pretest scores as a covariate).

            Here are some examples of patterns of results from the Solomon four group design.  Each cell contains a posttest mean.  Where a pretest was given, I have indicated the pretest mean in parentheses.

Treatment effect but no testing or Testing x Treatment interaction

 

Treatment

 

 

Pre-tested

Control

X

 

marginal

no

10

30

 

20

yes

10 (10)

30 (10)

 

20

marginal

10

30

 

20

 

Treatment and testing effects but no Testing x Treatment interaction

 

Treatment

 

 

Pre-tested

none

X

 

marginal

no

10

30

 

20

yes

20 (10)

40 (10)

 

30

marginal

15

35

 

25

 

Treatment and testing effects and a Testing x Treatment interaction

 

Treatment

 

 

Pre-tested

none

X

 

marginal

no

10

30

 

20

yes

20 (10)

60 (10)

 

40

marginal

15

45

 

30

Attachments:

Please find the article on JUBILEE PROJECT (JP)it has detailed information on JP.

Thanks.
Regards,
Ajaz

Attachments:

please see the net question above

Solomon Group-Pretest and post test

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp