Latest Activity

Dr. Mahabaleshwara Rao Baikady posted an event

7th National Conference on Management of Modern Libraries (NACML)-2027) at Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal

January 29, 2027 at 9am to January 30, 2027 at 5pm
16 hours ago
Nandeesha B posted an event
Thumbnail

One-Day Workshop on "AI for Library Services" at Mysuru, Karnataka

August 8, 2026 all day
16 hours ago
Dr.Kiran Malavade updated their profile
Friday
ABHISHEK KUMAR GAUD updated their profile
Friday
DP left a comment for P.MEENA PRIYA DHARSHINI
Friday
Shivaganga salotagi updated their profile
Thursday
Charushila Ramkrishna Chinchkar updated their profile
Jul 21
Satbir Chauhan posted an event
Thumbnail

ETD - 2026 : 29th International Symposium of Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) at IIT Delhi

October 23, 2026 at 9am to October 25, 2026 at 6pm
Jul 21
Moin Raza posted a blog post
Jul 18
Sanjeev Kumar updated their profile
Jul 15
S. Jaffer Basha left a comment for Pallavi Sushant Sapkal
Jul 15
Syed Abdal Ahmad Khan updated their profile
Jul 14
ASHWINI KULKARNI and KUMAR RAJ are now friends
Jul 12
Salauddeen khan posted a blog post
Jul 12
Anuj Kumar Singh posted a blog post
Jul 11
Dr. Saurabh Prajapati updated their profile
Jul 11
Nagender Singh updated their profile
Jul 10
Sunita Pareek posted an event
Jul 7
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN and Akshay Subhash Gadade are now friends
Jul 6
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Jul 6
Sir,
Here is an appeal to you from Lislink forum/ student community to reconsider the result of Net June '12 as we have seen many anomally in the process and criteria of publishing the Net result which does not match the prescribed criteria ...Sir,We want your intervention to stop these types of anomaly so that we will stop to go to the Courts for true Judgement. Please consider the Kerala High Court judgement and give us the result as we are not putting down the standard of Net after qualifying 60+% in PG and basic criteria of Net are satandard enough. This is not getting a Job but only a gate way to apply for Job in this age of Jobless and competitive, rude, biased society.

Faults are as follows:-
 

The criteria fixed by ugc in supplementary result is wrong .The change only for the general category students butOBC and SC/ST category students did not get the benefits of this criteria .I share the information to my lawyer .ugc again n trap.The suplimentry result criteria against obc and sc /st category and Ugc violats the rule of equality.If ugc delete wrong/unevaluated questions then same effect/change comes in other category also.


In Library and information science cut off june 2012 was General :63.43 % OBC : 60% SC/ST :55%


How its possible the reduction in percentage of marks only for general category...???


Same questions but different marks awarded ????? ugc check the quantity only; not quality .


In some other subjects the general category have 65 % but in other categories a reduction in percentage of marks. Mathili (Sub Code: 18) ---------------------General : 65.00% but for SC/ST: 54.86 % Women Studies (Sub Code: 74)--------General : 65.00% but for SC/ST: 52.57 % Prakrit (Sub Code: 91)---------------------- General: 65.00% but for SC/ST: 54.86 %

Library and information science June 2012 cut off

General 63.43 % Qualified 504

OBC 60% Qualified 352

PWD 55% Qualified 18

SC/ST 55% Qualified 294

There is a lot of dough about to create such type of ((subject wise & category wise)) criteria combining all three papers. like mass communication & journalism, (Sub Code 63)

Gen. Category. 45.71%

OBC Category. 45.14%

Sub Code 89 (Envi. Sc.)

Gen Cat. 56.57%

OBC Cat. 54.06%

PWD Cat. 52.57%

SC/ST Cat. 52%, and so on in all subjects have their own different Cut Off Subject Wise & Category Wise. Please you may check also above Slides provided by Jomy Jose after getting from UGC under RTI Act 2005.

In the first Result the cut off was:

GEN. 65%

OBC. 60%

SC/ST/PWD. 55%

the above cut off was common for all Subjects & Categories given above.

But for Supplementary Result:

the UGC prepared Subject Wise & Category Wise Criteria in a different way ??????? think and rethink again and again on this issue and be active....................

After declaration of revised results we should lodge the case on UGC of time wasting / money wasting / mentally harassment case.

Sir, We want your intervention to stop this type of anomally so that we will stop to go to the Courts for true Judgement. Please consider the Kerala High Court judgement and give us the result as we are not putting down the standard of Net after qualifying 60+% in PG and basic criteria of Net are satandard enough. This is not getting a Job but only a gate way to apply for Job in this age of Jobless and competitive society. Thanking you.

Faithfully

Prosenjit Dey

Views: 1189

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

yes ,very good.It is o.k

For reserved category result of library science is not given in supplementary result and UGC have violated the rules of equality and they have given result only for general category up to 63.49 percent.

Dear LIS friends...

What is the real fact of the UGC NET june 2012?

Please give correct information or discontinue these discussions

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp