Latest Activity

Salauddeen khan posted blog posts
14 hours ago
Sunita Pareek posted an event
17 hours ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN and Akshay Subhash Gadade are now friends
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
yesterday
Dr.Akash Kumar Singh replied to Yogesh Awasthi's discussion Admission Notice from G. F. College, Shahjahanpur, U.P.
yesterday
Akshay Subhash Gadade shared a profile on Facebook
Sunday
Bidyut Bikash Kalita updated their profile
Saturday
Dr. Sheel Bhadra Yadav posted a discussion
Saturday
chinnadurai.D posted a discussion
Saturday
Dr. Shivangkumar Bhaskarbhai Mah updated their profile
Jul 1
Dr. Shivangkumar Bhaskarbhai Mah and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
Jul 1
Krishna kumar yadav shared a profile on Facebook
Jul 1
Krishna kumar yadav updated their profile
Jul 1
B. Rymbai updated their profile
Jun 28
Sathishkumar and Vijay Kumar Pagidikathula are now friends
Jun 28
Nidhi kushwaha updated their profile
Jun 28
Bidyut Bikash Kalita posted a blog post
Jun 27
Evana Mukherjee updated their profile
Jun 24
Amit joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Jun 23
Amit joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Jun 23

Rules Can’t be Introduced Just Before Exam Results: HC

DC | Shashiprasad S.M. | 04th Aug 2013

Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court has held that regulations cannot be introduced at the fag end of an examination process or just before or at the time of announcement of results.

The court passed the order while quashing the category-wise qualifying criteria for eligibility for lecturers’ posts for the UGC NET last year.

Justice Ashok B. Hinchigeri passed the order recently, while allowing two petitions challenging action by the University Grants Commiss­ion, which had changed the eligibility criteria for general category candidates at the time of announcing the results for exams held in June 2012.

A 36-year-old lecturer and an advocate, postgraduates in law from Mysore University, had appeared for the National Eligibility Test (NET) for the junior research fellowship and lecturer posts.

The eligibility criteria for the post of lectureship for the candidates from general category was initially set at 40% in paper-I, 40% in paper-II and 50% in paper-III. As per the notification issued by the UGC NET Bureau, both the petitioners had obtained the minimum qualifying percentage in all the three papers.

But the NET Bureau, at the time of announcing the results, raised the minimum qualifying percentage to aggregate 65 for the candidates from general category, prompting the two petitioners to approach the court.

The counsel for the petitioners submitted that the terms and conditions at the time of calling for the applications govern the entire process of the test, including the fixing of the minimum marks and the announcement of results.

 “Midway, the minimum qualifying percentage cannot be varied to the disadvantage of the candidates,” the advocate argued, placing before the court an order of the Kerala High Court quashing the upward revision of minimum qualifying percentage.

The court ordered: “The aggregate 65 as minimum qualifying percentage is quashed. It is declared that the petitioners have acquired the eligibility criteria for lectureship, if they have indeed secured 40 per cent in paper – I, 40 per cent in paper – II and 50 per cent in paper – III or more.” The court also directed the UGC to issue the eligibility certificate to the petitioners before August 16. 

Views: 460

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

what happens next, will the UGC give the certificate or we need to wait for a another year or so... while Supreme Court gives its verdict. 

Congratulations!!!!!!!!!!

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp