Latest Activity

Moin Raza posted a blog post
Saturday
Sanjeev Kumar updated their profile
Thursday
S. Jaffer Basha left a comment for Pallavi Sushant Sapkal
Thursday
Syed Abdal Ahmad Khan updated their profile
Jul 14
ASHWINI KULKARNI and KUMAR RAJ are now friends
Jul 12
Salauddeen khan posted a blog post
Jul 12
Anuj Kumar Singh posted a blog post
Jul 11
Dr. Saurabh Prajapati updated their profile
Jul 11
Nagender Singh updated their profile
Jul 10
Sunita Pareek posted an event
Jul 7
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN and Akshay Subhash Gadade are now friends
Jul 6
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Jul 6
Dr.Akash Kumar Singh replied to Yogesh Awasthi's discussion Admission Notice from G. F. College, Shahjahanpur, U.P.
Jul 6
Akshay Subhash Gadade shared a profile on Facebook
Jul 4
Bidyut Bikash Kalita updated their profile
Jul 4
Dr. Sheel Bhadra Yadav posted a discussion
Jul 3
chinnadurai.D posted a discussion
Jul 3
Dr. Shivangkumar Bhaskarbhai Mah updated their profile
Jul 1
Dr. Shivangkumar Bhaskarbhai Mah and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
Jul 1
Krishna kumar yadav shared a profile on Facebook
Jul 1

Rules Can’t be Introduced Just Before Exam Results: HC

DC | Shashiprasad S.M. | 04th Aug 2013

Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court has held that regulations cannot be introduced at the fag end of an examination process or just before or at the time of announcement of results.

The court passed the order while quashing the category-wise qualifying criteria for eligibility for lecturers’ posts for the UGC NET last year.

Justice Ashok B. Hinchigeri passed the order recently, while allowing two petitions challenging action by the University Grants Commiss­ion, which had changed the eligibility criteria for general category candidates at the time of announcing the results for exams held in June 2012.

A 36-year-old lecturer and an advocate, postgraduates in law from Mysore University, had appeared for the National Eligibility Test (NET) for the junior research fellowship and lecturer posts.

The eligibility criteria for the post of lectureship for the candidates from general category was initially set at 40% in paper-I, 40% in paper-II and 50% in paper-III. As per the notification issued by the UGC NET Bureau, both the petitioners had obtained the minimum qualifying percentage in all the three papers.

But the NET Bureau, at the time of announcing the results, raised the minimum qualifying percentage to aggregate 65 for the candidates from general category, prompting the two petitioners to approach the court.

The counsel for the petitioners submitted that the terms and conditions at the time of calling for the applications govern the entire process of the test, including the fixing of the minimum marks and the announcement of results.

 “Midway, the minimum qualifying percentage cannot be varied to the disadvantage of the candidates,” the advocate argued, placing before the court an order of the Kerala High Court quashing the upward revision of minimum qualifying percentage.

The court ordered: “The aggregate 65 as minimum qualifying percentage is quashed. It is declared that the petitioners have acquired the eligibility criteria for lectureship, if they have indeed secured 40 per cent in paper – I, 40 per cent in paper – II and 50 per cent in paper – III or more.” The court also directed the UGC to issue the eligibility certificate to the petitioners before August 16. 

Views: 460

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

what happens next, will the UGC give the certificate or we need to wait for a another year or so... while Supreme Court gives its verdict. 

Congratulations!!!!!!!!!!

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp