Latest Activity

Arunima Giri and Akshay Subhash Gadade are now friends
3 hours ago
Mahesh B. updated their profile
18 hours ago
Akshay Subhash Gadade joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
yesterday
K Chiyuh commented on Hema Thakur's event 'One Day National Seminar on the Future of Libraries in the Era of Artificial Intelligence'
yesterday
K Chiyuh might attend Hema Thakur's event
yesterday
Mr.Vipul Kumar updated their profile
yesterday
Mr.Vipul Kumar shared a profile on Facebook
yesterday
Profile IconUmasankar mahata, Nikita Medhi, Prohlad Basumatary and 81 more joined LIS Links
Monday
Dr. SUDHI S VIJAYAN posted a discussion
Monday
Kanika sharma is now friends with Ramesh Kumar and Deepak Sharma
Sunday
Oriental Library Association shared their discussion on Facebook
Friday
Sumit Sundar Ray updated their profile
Thursday
Alka Gohel posted a discussion
Apr 15
Anna Poorani posted a blog post
Apr 15
Manoj Kumar posted a blog post
Apr 15
Mr. Ambaresh H posted a blog post
Apr 15
Anna Kaushik posted a discussion
Apr 15
Gopalji updated their profile
Apr 13
Anna Poorani updated their profile
Apr 12

We would like to purchase Plagiarism checking software for our private university for checking PhD. scholar works. Kindly suggest best software

Views: 917

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear 

It is Turnitin we are using the same.

Urkund plagiarism software

iThanticate, VeriGuide,The Plagiarism Checker, See Sources, Plag Tracker, PlagScan, Plagium, Plagiarisma, Plagiarism Detector, Plagiarism Detect, Plagiarism Checker X, Attributor, Copyscape, Crosscheck, Ephorus, Google, eTBLAST, CopyTracker etc.,

Contact Inflibnet centre for URKUND

All of us should understand that it is dangerous to depend on the plagiarism detection tools. They match only characters and words, but not concepts. I can challenge that if you give me a work and allow me 15 minutes, I can do a few changes in the file and no tool can detect it. These tools have many limitations. Use of human intelligence with some help from these tools will really works. We can note that most of the reputed journals never use these tools, rather use reviewers' knowledge on the content. Machine learning based software are now used by people to prepare a paper and these detection tools fail to detect such machine-produced papers. We have hundreds of illustrations to show the failure of these plagiarism detection tools. Hence most of the senior scientists say clearly - plagiarism detection is a misnomer!

Many thanks Ms.Saba Sarasvdy for your open remarks highlighting the differences among Words, Characters and Concepts.
Best Wishes,

Siddhartha S. Ray, Calcutta

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp