LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

meghabat singh updated their profile
2 hours ago
Elukoti Bhosle updated their profile
5 hours ago
DEVI SHANKAR DINGARA updated their profile
yesterday
ASHUTOSH KAG updated their profile
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted discussions
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN is now friends with Ramesh Kumar and Suraj Morya
yesterday
Archanagita Saikia posted a discussion
yesterday
Manju Meerwal joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Thursday
Dr. O Seshaiaih posted a discussion
Thursday
Dr. A. Madhava Rao posted an event

Online-Lecture on "AI Tools for Academic Research Writing and Publishing" at Microsoft Teams (Online)

August 4, 2025 from 2pm to 4pm
Thursday
Dr. Badan Barman posted a blog post
Thursday
MANJEET KHATRI posted a blog post
Thursday
Profile IconRadhika J, Mohan, RP Raaj and 36 more joined LIS Links
Thursday
MANJEET KHATRI updated their profile
Wednesday
DEVI SHANKAR DINGARA shared a profile on Facebook
Tuesday
Dr.Stephen.G replied to Dr.Stephen.G's discussion Call for Papers – ICDIASLS-2025
Sunday
Dr.Stephen.G posted a discussion
Sunday
CHETAN RAVAL updated their profile
Jul 11
Bilal Rabbani is now friends with Millan Krushna Dutta and Mhuammad Rafiq Akhtar
Jul 10

What should be the evaluation criterial for technical processing section in a library?

We all know that library is a system, contains different sections, technical processing section is one of the section in a library, if we want to evaluate the technical processing section for the development of the performance, what criteria we should follow, is there any standard criteria available for that?

Waiting for resoponse

Facebook

Views: 230

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

If you want to evaluate the technical processing section for the development of the performance. There are following criteria you can adopt for the performance for said ques.
1. Evidence of productivity and efficiency in divisional operations and use of “best practices.”
2. Evidence of personal productivity and good problem solving skills.
3. Evidence of staff support and cooperation.
4. Evidence of good communications skills.
5. Evidence of knowledge of current trends and changing technology in the areas of the technical services and of library automation.

regards,
Akhtar Hussain
It's very good suggestion AKHTER sir!! and thanks to Seha ji for adding such a nice topic.


pvz
Thanks
One more aspect, adequacy and standard of number of staff should also be considered keeping with the view of number of books processed and overall collection of the library.
Thanks for the reply.
no standard criteria available for that but i thank the interaction with user as well as the particular staff member & then librarian positive view is the best idea for the development of the performance.
Thanks for your reply.

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop