Replies to This Forum

Permalink Reply by MICHAEL on March 3, 2013 at 20:01

What about the latest news 04/03/2012 Write Appeal at kerala high court?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pravin Umraoji Wasu on March 4, 2013 at 21:20

jun 2012 What about KHC result 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dr sunil tiwari on March 5, 2013 at 2:41

new update abut kerla high court net case ...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by MICHAEL on March 5, 2013 at 18:55

Next Date of Hearing :     Thursday, March 14, 2013     

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Uday Murmu on March 6, 2013 at 17:49

Forget the KHC decision. Concentrate on June 2013 NET. Don't waste your valuable time.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Vijayalakshmi Sailapathi on March 10, 2013 at 22:53

Scam behind the UGC's Appeal

to hckerala

To:

 HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE DR.MANJULA CHELLUR

 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

Respected Madam/Sir,

In the following matter that will be placed before your honorable Court mostly by 14th of March or later the UGC has constituted NET review committee to circumvent the Court.
It has become customary of UGC to set up such committees to shield itself

from the wrath of the Courts. This committee is just an eyewash to

coverup the blunder of the June 2012 NET examination. The matter is now

with the Division Bench of the Kerala High Court.  Now the AG's argument will

be to appeal to your Bench to ensure no interference of the Court with

the functioning of the committee! An eyewash!

http://www.indiaeducationreview.com/news/ugc-constitutes-net-review...

The UGC's NET examination had objectivity in evaluation built in to it even before this June 2012 examination in spite of having the third paper as written paper. The methodology was that UGC will decide the result only based on the performance in First and Second paper as per their norm and the third paper will be evaluated only for those who have cleared the First and Second paper to give an indication to the employers as to how that particular candidate fares in a subjective evaluation. Therefore the UGC's claim that the revised objective pattern as the reason for the anomaly in the result that required their intervention in deciding the Second Cut-Off after the conduct of examination is a cover-up to some scam. Though I am a petitioner against an earlier such Committee by UGC in UGC (The matter is referred as SLP (C) 36023 - 32 of 2010) in Supreme Court, I am without any way and means to convey this to the Bench and hence this e-mail

 

WA 44/2013                      SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, CGC /

      IN WPC 22187/2012              SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND

     & IA 107/2013  LEAVE            SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN

     & IA 54/2013   IMPLEAD          SRI.SAIJO HASSAN

     & IA 71/2013   IMPLEAD          SRI.PRATHAP PILLAI

     & IA 91/2013   IMPLEAD          SRI.BENOJ C AUGUSTIN

     & IA 108/2013  IMPLEAD          SRI.I.J.AUGUSTINE

     & IA 57/2013   IMPLEAD          SRI.SEBIN THOMAS

     & IA 90/2013   LEAVE            SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP (SR.)

                                     SRI.S.MANU

                                     SMT.K.DEEPA (PAYYANUR)

                                     SRI.A.G.BASIL

                                     SRI.SWATHY DAS

         WITH

     WA 74/2013                      SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, CGC /

      IN WPC 22280/2012              SRI.A.C.DEVASIA

                                     SRI.K.C.ELDHO

                                     SRI.K.JAJU BABU

                                     SRI.K.RAJESH SUKUMARAN

         WITH

     WA 79/2013                      SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, CGC /

      IN WPC 24133/2012              SRI.A.SHAFEEK (KAYAMKULAM)

        WITH

    WA 117/2013

      IN WPC 26468/2012              SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, CGC /

                                     SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ

        WITH

    WA 142/2013

      IN WPC 26704/2012              SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, CGC /

                                     SRI.A.RAJASIMHAN

        WITH

    WA 143/2013

      IN WPC 23759/2012              SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, CGC /

       & IA 69/2013    EXEMPT        SRI.C.K.PRASAD

                                                        Contd....2

Court -1                   Page 2                       05/03/2013

        WITH

    WA 145/2013

      IN WPC 22939/2012         SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, CGC /

       & IA 72/2013   EXEMPT    SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ

        WITH

    WA 162/2013

      IN WPC 23821/2012         SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, CGC /

       & IA 79/2013   EXEMPT    SRI.K.S.ARUN KUMAR

        WITH

    WA 163/2013

      IN WPC 23770/2012         SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, CGC /

       & IA 80/2013   EXEMPT    SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ

        WITH

    WA 164/2013

      IN WPC 24793/2012         SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, CGC /

       & IA 81/2013   EXEMPT    SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ

        WITH

    WA 170/2013

      IN WPC 24278/2012         SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, CGC /

       & IA 86/2013   EXEMPT    SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASG OF INDIA -SERVED

                                ON(NO MEMO)

                                SRI.M.P.MADHAVANKUTTY

        WITH

    WA 171/2013

      IN WPC 24106/2012         SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, CGC /

       & IA 87/2013   EXEMPT     SRI.K.B.ARUNKUMAR

        WITH

    WA 173/2013

      IN WPC 23746/2012         SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, CGC /

       & IA 88/2013   EXEMPT    SRI.R.V.SREEJITH


Prof

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by MICHAEL on March 13, 2013 at 22:06

UGC Right To Information (RTI) replied letter attached for your information

Attachments:

• 1.jpg, 397 KB
• jj.png, 186 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Vijayalakshmi Sailapathi on March 14, 2013 at 6:08

Get the CD and expose the scam! What happened today to WA 44/2013

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by MICHAEL on March 14, 2013 at 18:53

Dear friends , UGC's appeal in Kerala HC DB hearing posted on 18-03-2013

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Vijayalakshmi Sailapathi on March 14, 2013 at 19:53

But the Court website has not updated this info in their portal! Will the appeal case be dismissed at the stage of admission?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by AHEEN MANDAL on March 14, 2013 at 20:32

Ultimately what happen after 18/03/2013, do you know?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Vijayalakshmi Sailapathi on March 14, 2013 at 21:05

Simple. If the Court dismisses the appeal the UGC will go to Supreme Court with the appeal. But that will be delayed for the matters pending at the other HC also has to be drawn.

If the appeal gets admitted then the Kerala HC will take another 2 months to make final Judgement.

The best solution to this can come only if someone gained audacity to pray to the Kerala HC to scrap the June 2012 and Dec 2012 exam and to restrain UGC or any other to conduct any more examination till the matter is decided in the Court.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• …
• 7
• Next ›
• Page