LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

Sanjay Shahjit replied to shradhashesh's discussion Dissertation publish in book format
3 hours ago
Saaswatee Sahoo and Ramesh Kumar are now friends
3 hours ago
Ramesh Kumar might attend Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN's event
9 hours ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN and Naveen Dobriyal are now friends
9 hours ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted an event
9 hours ago
Paojathang Haokip posted a status
"Thank you LIS Links for accepting me as a member."
11 hours ago
Naveen Dobriyal updated their profile
11 hours ago
Nuria Bautista posted a discussion
14 hours ago
Profile IconRachnaye, Ramesh Kumar, Jayashree Konwar and 91 more joined LIS Links
15 hours ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
17 hours ago
Laxman Prasad updated their profile
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted an event

Final Call for Papers: CALIBER-2025. at Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh

November 17, 2025 at 9am to November 19, 2025 at 5pm
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Tuesday
Alekha Karadia posted a blog post
Tuesday
Profile IconRAMAKANTA SAHU, Rajendra Dhiman, Dr H Nayana and 6 more joined LIS Links
Monday
Pradeep Kumar Singh posted a discussion
Monday
Rathod Pradip J. joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Monday
Rathod Pradip J. joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Monday
Dr. Anil Kumar Jharotia left a comment for Bibhuti Nath Jha
Monday

NET: court declines stay Source The Hindu 23-01-2012

NET: court declines  stay

K0CHI:  A Division Bench  of the Kerala  High Court on Tues-day declined to  stay a single

judge's  order  quashing  the University  Grants  Commission's  (UGC)'s  new  eligibility

criteria  for  the  National Eligibility  Test.

The bench comprising Chief Justice Manjula Chellur and Justice K, Vinod Chandran posted an appeal

filed by the UGC to February 5 For Final Hearing

The  Single  Judge  had also directed the UGC to grant certificates to candidates who had obtained the minimum mark  prescribed  earlier

UGC's contention

The UGC contended that the court had no right to make a declaration regarding the result of a test. The original notification had clearly' stated that the candidates should obtain minimum required marks in each paper separately.It had also been said that the qualifying criteria for Junior Research Fellowship and
eligibility for Lectureship would be decided by the UGC before the declaration of results

It was a moderation committee appointed by the UGC and consisting of senior academicians that had

rec-commended that the general, OBC (non-creamy layer) and the SC/ST candidates would be required to obtain an aggregate percentage of 65, 60 and 55 respectively in addition to the paper vise minimum Percentage as qualifying criteria the  UGC said.

Within powers
The appeal said that in order to maintain high standard in education, prescription of an aggregate percentage in an examination was well within the powers of UGC. Prescribing the Qualifying criteria by fixing an aggregate percentage could not be called change of rules in the middle of the test\. No new criterion was introduced by UGC



Views: 3079

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

but what guarantee final hearing will be on 5th fab. ek baar postponed hota hai toh postponed hamesha hote rehta hai. allah jaane kya hoga?

Tareekh pe tareekh milti rahi hai lekin insaaf nahin milta. Milti hai to sirf tareekh. Kanoon ke dalalon ne tareekh ko ek hathiyar ki tarah istemaal kiya hai - a dialogue from hindi film and comment on indian judicial system.

I must say that never loose hopes. Hum honge kamyaab ek din, man main hai vishwas pur ahai vishwaas hum honge kaamyab ek din.

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop