Replies to This Forum

Permalink Reply by HASE JYOTI S on September 22, 2012 at 4:26

Sir, I am with you kindly made a good voice on this

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by KUMAR NARENDRA on September 24, 2012 at 1:33

pLEASE READ CAREFULY ALL THE CANDIDATE WHO APPEARED NET BUT NOT QUALIFIED -  I ATTECHED IMPORTANT THINGS -

PLEASE GO THE COURT BEAUSE ugc SHOUD BE METIONED ALL THE THINGS LIKE ELIGIBLITY CRITERIA SUBJECTWISE .

UGC IS NOT PUBLISHED PREVIOUSLY IN NOTIFICATION  OBJECTIVE MODE FROM JUNE 2012 IS NOT METIONED " AGGREGATE MARKS OF THREE PAPERS IS NOT METIONED . SHOULD BE METIONED BUT UGC MISTAKE HE IS NOT METIONED .

The Criteria at the time of Notification –JUNE 2012

 

Category Minimum marks (%) to be obtained Paper-I Paper-II Paper-III General 40 (40%) 40 (40%) 75 (50%) OBC (Non-creamy layer) 35 (35%) 35 (35%) 67.5 (45%) rounded off to 68 PH/VH/SC/ST 35 (35%) 35 (35%) 60 (40%)

 

After Results of NET  June 2012

Category-wise Qualifying Criteria for Lectureship Eligibility in UGC-NET held on 24th June 2012

 

Category	Minimum qualifying Percentage
	Paper –I	Paper –II	Paper –III	Aggregate of All three Papers
General	40%	40%	50%	65%
OBC(non Creamy Layer)	35%	35%	45%	60%
SC/ST/PWD	35%	35%	40%	55%

 

If candidate is all the three papers obtain above marks the aggregate is not possible i.e. 65%, 60%&55%

The as per ugc is possible,  if candidate obtain marks as below level he has qualified level.

IS my Opinion – As per UGC

 

Category	Minimum qualifying Percentage
	Paper –I	Paper –II	Paper –III	Aggregate of All three Papers
General	65%	65%	65%	65%
OBC(non Creamy Layer)	60%	60%	60%	60%
SC/ST/PWD	55%	55%	55%	55%

1. The UGC is Not mentioned JRF Criteria Till date in university website
2. You are living in digital information era not hidden information era.
3.  Only such candidates who obtain the minimum required marks in each Paper, separately, as mentioned above, will be considered for final preparation of result.However, the final qualifying criteria for Junior Research Fellowship (JRF) and eligibility for Lectureship shall be decided by UGC before declaration of result. 
4. I agree but this line is important  ( minimum required marks in each Paper, separately, as mentioned above)  but AGGREGATE PERCENTAGE   is not mentioned in the line. In the notification  
5. In notification not mentioned for merit basis list for consideration for final result & large number of Candidate line preparation. SO UGC HAS NO RIGHT TO CHANGE AFTER RESULTS DECLARATION .

 

 

UGC NET results leave students an angry lot (source Hindu)

‘Qualification norms changed after publication of result’ A group of candidates, who appeared for the National Eligibility Test (NET) of the University

Grants Commission, are preparing to move the Court against an alleged post-result alteration of the Test’s qualification norms by the Commission. The

NET results were published on September 18. After the publication of the results, the Commission allegedly altered the Test’s qualification norms by

mandating that candidates in the general category score an aggregate of 65 per cent for all three of the NET’s papers to become eligible for lectureship. For

OBC, SC/ST The corresponding figure for the OBC category is 60 per cent and that of the SC/ST category is 55 per cent. Bincy Verghese, who wrote

the NET for Malayalam language, told The Hindu here onWednesday that in the original notification of the UGC it was specified that candidates in the

general category should score at least 40 per cent for papers one and two and 50 per cent for paper three to be eligible for consideration for the final

preparation of the result. “There was no aggregate mentioned. I, for instance have scored 62 each for papers one and two and 98 for paper three.

According to the original UGC notification, anyone in the general category who scores 155, would become eligible for consideration for the finalresult.

Now, only those with 65 per cent or 227.5 marks will make the cut. I have not qualified. This new criterion was made known to us only after the

publication of the results. Already about 30 candidates have come together to file a court case,” she explained. In the same manner, a candidate in the OBC

category who need have scored only 138 marks now needs 210 marks to qualify. New qualification For the SC/ST category, the new qualification cut-off

will be 192.5 as against the earlier specified 130. Papers one and two have a maximum of 100 marks and paper three, 150. However, the ‘Scheme of

Test’ link in the UGC’s National Educational Testing Bureau’s website also mentions that “…the final qualifying criteria for Junior Research Fellowshiplislinks.com/forum/topics/those-who-got-ugc-net-2012-marks-more-than-eligible-criteria?id=2013205%… 7/8

(JRF) and Eligibility for Lectureship shall be decided by the UGC before the publication of (the) result.” In answer to a query from the University of Kerala

on this issue on Wednesday, a senior UGC official reportedly explained that the final qualification cut-off arrived at by the UGC was in relation to the topscores in each paper. This information is confidential and this was why it was not published earlier. No change There was no post-result alteration of anynorm, the official reportedly added. Despite repeated attempts, the Deputy Secretary of the National Educational Testing Division Surender Singh could not

be reached for comment.

▶ Reply

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by KUMAR NARENDRA on September 24, 2012 at 22:59

ALL students i requested  please obtain  information UNDER THe Right to Information Act 2005 for containing following information alongwith 10 Rs postal order to UGC Net Bureau  information officer Delhi .

1. OMR Sheet Photo Copy of  candidate NEt June 2012  .

2.  Approved  Noting who used in this Objective Type Examination signed by Higher Authorities.

3.  WHat is the eligiblity criteria of JRF ? Why not published till date ? What the region as per ELigiblity Criteria .

4. Why not published  words FINAL AGGREGATE MARKS OF ALL THE THREE PAPERS , WHY PUBLISHED FINAL ELIGIBLITY CRITERIA  DECIDED BEFORE DECLARATION OF RESULTS .

5. UGC WROTE IN NOTIFICATION SEPARATE PAPER ELIGIBLITY CRITERIA  WHU CHANGE D AGGREGATE MARKS OF THREE PAPERS. please explain 

6. subjectwise cut off list why noy follow this criteria if number of candidate excess for passing old criteria .. 

7. UGC HAS HIDDEN ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION , THIS INFORMATION  IS NOT PUBLISHED FOR ALL  WHAT IS THE CAUSE ? 

AND ONE COPY WILL BE SEND TO compitition commssion of india  for information  this exmination 

if ugc has not reply please infom /write to Central Information commissionor  New delhi 

jo log yeh kah rahe hai ki notofication me sub kuch likh diya tha ki final criteria ugc decide karega , bhai logo aap candidate hoo aur right to information act ke jamanre me ji rahe hoo yesi baat aap pade likhe log se ummid nahi thi ? hiddion information jamane me nahi. 

 

jago all students jago 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by sam on September 24, 2012 at 5:51

hi dears i am Sam from Kerala.i didnt pass the net this time though i got 202 marks total(obc).go ahead sir. let me ask about our claim first. what should be the criteria?as UGC has declared earlier, it was sure of the cut off mark. now the losers want to lower the cut off mark, then how much? surely we can never question UGC about this in any court. but we can do one thing. ask the UGC TO MAKE CUT OFF MARKS PAPER(SUBJECT ) WISE. I DO SUPPORT YOU SIR.GO AHEAD....

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Babar Raees on September 24, 2012 at 6:49

I am with u sir, My contact no. is 7428173930

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Varun Murali on September 24, 2012 at 7:53

we all are with you..

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by M. Shiva Reddy on September 24, 2012 at 19:31

i have got 1st paper 58 2nd paper 64 3rd paper 88  total 210 i.e.60% do something for this

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by M. Shiva Reddy on September 24, 2012 at 20:10

you r right NET is only a eligibility criteria it is not the final to get any job.  this criteria should be same to all.  for example the students who joins in engineering they will get seat based on reservation but the pass criteria for all will be the same it is only an example for any course the admission process involves the reservation but qualifying / pass criteria will be the same. The same rule should be follow here.  here the UGC is not following natural justice.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by M. Shiva Reddy on September 24, 2012 at 20:15

let all UGC office bearers pass NET first.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Sk Abdul Azim on September 24, 2012 at 21:05

Yes i am agree with U

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Srinivas Garimella on September 29, 2012 at 13:03

Very good Sir, But, is there any chance of REDUCING the Qualifying Criteria (say Cut-off mark) by the writ petition? I mean REDUCING 65% to 60% for GEN, 60% to 55% for OBC and 55% to 50% for SC, STs & Disabled. Pl inform me updated information regarding this issue.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by saranjit kaur on September 26, 2012 at 19:47

how can we see our marks in different papers even if i have not passed the UGC Net 2012, please reply.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9
• 10
• 11
• Next ›
• Page