LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

CHETAN RAVAL updated their profile
5 hours ago
Bilal Rabbani is now friends with Millan Krushna Dutta and Mhuammad Rafiq Akhtar
23 hours ago
Vinod Kumar Jain posted a blog post
yesterday
neema shukla posted an event
Thumbnail

International Conference on Libraries and Emerging Technologies for Smart Knowledge Ecosystems (ICLET 2025), at Jaipur,Rajasthan

November 14, 2025 at 9am to November 15, 2025 at 6pm
yesterday
Rohidas Rathod posted an event
yesterday
Hemanta Kumar Biswal posted an event
Thumbnail

4th International Symposium on Knowledge Engineering for Digital Library Design (KEDLD-2025) at Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

November 3, 2025 to November 5, 2025
yesterday
SHIVAKUMARA BC posted a discussion
yesterday
Swati replied to Jayant Deshpande's discussion Librarian are forced to teach a subject
Wednesday
OKE CHANDAN updated their profile
Wednesday
jai prakash kumar updated their profile
Tuesday
Rohidas Rathod updated their profile
Tuesday
Rohidas Bhimrao Rathod updated their profile
Tuesday
Rohidas Bhimrao Rathod updated their profile
Tuesday
Vinod Kumar Jain posted a status
"Required Library paid Intern @ 8000 PM for 6 Months for “Indexing Database”- in Delhi, 9818180051"
Monday
Vinod Kumar Jain posted a status
"Required Library Intern for “Indexing Database”- in Delhi"
Monday
Dr.Stephen.G commented on Dr.Stephen.G's event 'International Conference on Digital and Innovative Advancements for Sustainable Library Services'
Sunday
Dr.Stephen.G posted an event

International Conference on Digital and Innovative Advancements for Sustainable Library Services at Bharati Vidyapeeth’s Institute of Computer Applications & Management (BVICAM), New Delhi

August 29, 2025 at 10am to August 31, 2025 at 5pm
Sunday
Dr.Stephen.G posted a discussion
Sunday
Yogesh Kawale updated their profile
Jul 2
Peeyush Dwivedi posted a blog post
Jul 2

Those who got UGC NET 2012 marks more than eligible criteria please cooperate to sue case in in the court

Respected Sir/ Madam,

    Those who got marks more than eligible criteria for example

       
Category

Minimum marks (%) to be obtained

Paper-I

Paper-II

Paper-III

General

40 (40%)

40 (40%)

75 (50%)

OBC (Non-creamy layer)

35 (35%)

35 (35%)

67.5 (45%) rounded off to 68

PH/VH/SC/ST

35 (35%)

35 (35%)

60 (40%)

 

 

Those who  got eligible marks please cooperate to sue case in in the court

Thanking you

Regards

Librarin

C E S First Grade College Mannaekhelli

Views: 27231

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

 Dear professionals

I request all of you not to cooperate with Mr. Shivasharanappa & not to lose your prestige or carrier bcoz he is trying to show his power about how much student he could gathered against UGC's decission.

 

UGC already told clearly about the final criteria that would be taken before the final result publish.

Someone has commented about this matter and provide a link where clearly written.

If u go to court against this decission, u would get nothing.

So don't try to see any dream about yourself and not to otherself bcoz this a wasting of time.

This is the final result, those who hv not got this sorry please try for the next time otherwise there is no way.

thank you

 

 

Our fight is for bring transferancy in net exam. WE WANT TO KNOW ON WHAT BASES AND HOW UGC CALCULATES CUT OFF MARKS? WHAT PARAMETERS IT CONSIDER FOR CALCULATING CUT OFF AND WHY? IS THERE ANY EQUATION TO CALCULATE CUT OF MARKS? WHY UGC ALWAYS FOLLOW REVERS ORDER , FIRST DISPLAYING SELECTION LIST, NEXT CUT OFF MARKS, NEXT MARKS.. IS THERE ANY SENCE IN IT. THEY MUST DISPLAY MARKS FIRST , THEN CUT OFF, THEN SELECTION LIST. WHY AND HOW THEY CONSIDER ALL SUBJECTS EQUAL, ON WHAT BASES. WHEATHER UGC MAINTAINING UNIFORMITY IN EXAM RESULTS CALCULATION? BY PASSING MORE THAN 50% OF CANDIDAES WHEATHER UGC MAINTAING STANDARED OR IT IS REDUCING EXISTING STADARED OF EDUCATION? ONE THING I WANT TO CLEAR WE ARE NOT SAYING TO SELECT US , WE ARE SAYING TO FOLLOW CORRECT RULES TREAT ALL SUBJECTS EQUAL CALCULATE SUBJECTWISE CUT OFF AND MESURE SUBJECT WISE PERFORMANCE OF CANDIDATE.

next time , ugc were followed by the same criteria? and that time ugc  will came another criteria  then what can we do?

Hey Harisree

Don't excited. Be cool

Think yourself as a bastsman when u will be in the crease in strike then you don't know what would be the next ball that may be loose ball or may be bouncer or may be yorker what ever may be but u have to face for ur survival.

Nobody knows about the UGC's next step.

so just wait & see.

thanks

 Dr. Chittaranjan you are right

Our fight is for bring transferancy in net exam. WE WANT TO KNOW ON WHAT BASES AND HOW UGC CALCULATES CUT OFF MARKS? WHAT PARAMETERS IT CONSIDER FOR CALCULATING CUT OFF AND WHY? IS THERE ANY EQUATION TO CALCULATE CUT OF MARKS? WHY UGC ALWAYS FOLLOW REVERS ORDER , FIRST DISPLAYING SELECTION LIST, NEXT CUT OFF MARKS, NEXT MARKS.. IS THERE ANY SENCE IN IT. THEY MUST DISPLAY MARKS FIRST , THEN CUT OFF, THEN SELECTION LIST. WHY AND HOW THEY CONSIDER ALL SUBJECTS EQUAL, ON WHAT BASES. WHEATHER UGC MAINTAINING UNIFORMITY IN EXAM RESULTS CALCULATION? BY PASSING MORE THAN 50% OF CANDIDAES WHEATHER UGC MAINTAING STANDARED OR IT IS REDUCING EXISTING STADARED OF EDUCATION? ONE THING I WANT TO CLEAR WE ARE NOT SAYING TO SELECT US , WE ARE SAYING TO FOLLOW CORRECT RULES TREAT ALL SUBJECTS EQUAL CALCULATE SUBJECTWISE CUT OFF AND MESURE SUBJECT WISE PERFORMANCE OF CANDIDATE.
i am agree with sudesh kumar ugc clearly mentioned their eligibility criteria. i think no need file case

Sir 

i also poinout this problem because ugc has not metioned in before declaration of result notification 

please  visit this website

UGC NET Results: Candidates planning to reach Court against qualification norms
www.pardaphash.com
Read how UGC NET Results: Candidates planning to reach Court against qualification norms on PardaPhash

Sir, i am with u...

all the best

UGC NET results leave students an angry lot (source Hindu)

‘Qualification norms changed after publication of result’ A group of candidates, who appeared for the National Eligibility Test (NET) of the University Grants Commission, are preparing to move the Court against an alleged post-result alteration of the Test’s qualification norms by the Commission. The NET results were published on September 18. After the publication of the results, the Commission allegedly altered the Test’s qualification norms by mandating that candidates in the general category score an aggregate of 65 per cent for all three of the NET’s papers to become eligible for lectureship. For OBC, SC/ST The corresponding figure for the OBC category is 60 per cent and that of the SC/ST category is 55 per cent. Bincy Verghese, who wrote the NET for Malayalam language, told The Hindu here on Wednesday that in the original notification of the UGC it was specified that candidates in the general category should score at least 40 per cent for papers one and two and 50 per cent for paper three to be eligible for consideration for the final preparation of the result. “There was no aggregate mentioned. I, for instance have scored 62 each for papers one and two and 98 for paper three. According to the original UGC notification, anyone in the general category who scores 155, would become eligible for consideration for the final result. Now, only those with 65 per cent or 227.5 marks will make the cut. I have not qualified. This new criterion was made known to us only after the publication of the results. Already about 30 candidates have come together to file a court case,” she explained. In the same manner, a candidate in the OBC category who need have scored only 138 marks now needs 210 marks to qualify. New qualification For the SC/ST category, the new qualification cut-off will be 192.5 as against the earlier specified 130. Papers one and two have a maximum of 100 marks and paper three, 150. However, the ‘Scheme of Test’ link in the UGC’s National Educational Testing Bureau’s website also mentions that “…the final qualifying criteria for Junior Research Fellowship (JRF) and Eligibility for Lectureship shall be decided by the UGC before the publication of (the) result.” In answer to a query from the University of Kerala on this issue on Wednesday, a senior UGC official reportedly explained that the final qualification cut-off arrived at by the UGC was in relation to the top scores in each paper. This information is confidential and this was why it was not published earlier. No change There was no post-result alteration of any norm, the official reportedly added. Despite repeated attempts, the Deputy Secretary of the National Educational Testing Division Surender Singh could not be reached for comment.

i am also

Be prepare for Negative Marking in the next NET exam

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop