Replies to This Forum

Permalink Reply by kalyan sundar samanta on September 20, 2012 at 0:07

 Dear professionals

I request all of you not to cooperate with Mr. Shivasharanappa & not to lose your prestige or carrier bcoz he is trying to show his power about how much student he could gathered against UGC's decission.

 

UGC already told clearly about the final criteria that would be taken before the final result publish.

Someone has commented about this matter and provide a link where clearly written.

If u go to court against this decission, u would get nothing.

So don't try to see any dream about yourself and not to otherself bcoz this a wasting of time.

This is the final result, those who hv not got this sorry please try for the next time otherwise there is no way.

thank you

 

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Manu Manu on September 22, 2012 at 21:37

Our fight is for bring transferancy in net exam. WE WANT TO KNOW ON WHAT BASES AND HOW UGC CALCULATES CUT OFF MARKS? WHAT PARAMETERS IT CONSIDER FOR CALCULATING CUT OFF AND WHY? IS THERE ANY EQUATION TO CALCULATE CUT OF MARKS? WHY UGC ALWAYS FOLLOW REVERS ORDER , FIRST DISPLAYING SELECTION LIST, NEXT CUT OFF MARKS, NEXT MARKS.. IS THERE ANY SENCE IN IT. THEY MUST DISPLAY MARKS FIRST , THEN CUT OFF, THEN SELECTION LIST. WHY AND HOW THEY CONSIDER ALL SUBJECTS EQUAL, ON WHAT BASES. WHEATHER UGC MAINTAINING UNIFORMITY IN EXAM RESULTS CALCULATION? BY PASSING MORE THAN 50% OF CANDIDAES WHEATHER UGC MAINTAING STANDARED OR IT IS REDUCING EXISTING STADARED OF EDUCATION? ONE THING I WANT TO CLEAR WE ARE NOT SAYING TO SELECT US , WE ARE SAYING TO FOLLOW CORRECT RULES TREAT ALL SUBJECTS EQUAL CALCULATE SUBJECTWISE CUT OFF AND MESURE SUBJECT WISE PERFORMANCE OF CANDIDATE.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by HARISREE on September 20, 2012 at 0:34

next time , ugc were followed by the same criteria? and that time ugc  will came another criteria  then what can we do?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by kalyan sundar samanta on September 20, 2012 at 0:49

Hey Harisree

Don't excited. Be cool

Think yourself as a bastsman when u will be in the crease in strike then you don't know what would be the next ball that may be loose ball or may be bouncer or may be yorker what ever may be but u have to face for ur survival.

Nobody knows about the UGC's next step.

so just wait & see.

thanks

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jaynat Thakur on September 20, 2012 at 0:48

 Dr. Chittaranjan you are right

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Manu Manu on September 22, 2012 at 21:38

Our fight is for bring transferancy in net exam. WE WANT TO KNOW ON WHAT BASES AND HOW UGC CALCULATES CUT OFF MARKS? WHAT PARAMETERS IT CONSIDER FOR CALCULATING CUT OFF AND WHY? IS THERE ANY EQUATION TO CALCULATE CUT OF MARKS? WHY UGC ALWAYS FOLLOW REVERS ORDER , FIRST DISPLAYING SELECTION LIST, NEXT CUT OFF MARKS, NEXT MARKS.. IS THERE ANY SENCE IN IT. THEY MUST DISPLAY MARKS FIRST , THEN CUT OFF, THEN SELECTION LIST. WHY AND HOW THEY CONSIDER ALL SUBJECTS EQUAL, ON WHAT BASES. WHEATHER UGC MAINTAINING UNIFORMITY IN EXAM RESULTS CALCULATION? BY PASSING MORE THAN 50% OF CANDIDAES WHEATHER UGC MAINTAING STANDARED OR IT IS REDUCING EXISTING STADARED OF EDUCATION? ONE THING I WANT TO CLEAR WE ARE NOT SAYING TO SELECT US , WE ARE SAYING TO FOLLOW CORRECT RULES TREAT ALL SUBJECTS EQUAL CALCULATE SUBJECTWISE CUT OFF AND MESURE SUBJECT WISE PERFORMANCE OF CANDIDATE.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Chinnadurai. D on September 20, 2012 at 0:57

i am agree with sudesh kumar ugc clearly mentioned their eligibility criteria. i think no need file case

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by KUMAR NARENDRA on September 20, 2012 at 1:07

Sir 

i also poinout this problem because ugc has not metioned in before declaration of result notification 

please  visit this website

UGC NET Results: Candidates planning to reach Court against qualification norms

www.pardaphash.com

Read how UGC NET Results: Candidates planning to reach Court against qualification norms on PardaPhash

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Vikram Jadhav on September 20, 2012 at 1:18

Sir, i am with u...

all the best

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mallikarjuna on September 20, 2012 at 1:24

UGC NET results leave students an angry lot (source Hindu)

‘Qualification norms changed after publication of result’ A group of candidates, who appeared for the National Eligibility Test (NET) of the University Grants Commission, are preparing to move the Court against an alleged post-result alteration of the Test’s qualification norms by the Commission. The NET results were published on September 18. After the publication of the results, the Commission allegedly altered the Test’s qualification norms by mandating that candidates in the general category score an aggregate of 65 per cent for all three of the NET’s papers to become eligible for lectureship. For OBC, SC/ST The corresponding figure for the OBC category is 60 per cent and that of the SC/ST category is 55 per cent. Bincy Verghese, who wrote the NET for Malayalam language, told The Hindu here on Wednesday that in the original notification of the UGC it was specified that candidates in the general category should score at least 40 per cent for papers one and two and 50 per cent for paper three to be eligible for consideration for the final preparation of the result. “There was no aggregate mentioned. I, for instance have scored 62 each for papers one and two and 98 for paper three. According to the original UGC notification, anyone in the general category who scores 155, would become eligible for consideration for the final result. Now, only those with 65 per cent or 227.5 marks will make the cut. I have not qualified. This new criterion was made known to us only after the publication of the results. Already about 30 candidates have come together to file a court case,” she explained. In the same manner, a candidate in the OBC category who need have scored only 138 marks now needs 210 marks to qualify. New qualification For the SC/ST category, the new qualification cut-off will be 192.5 as against the earlier specified 130. Papers one and two have a maximum of 100 marks and paper three, 150. However, the ‘Scheme of Test’ link in the UGC’s National Educational Testing Bureau’s website also mentions that “…the final qualifying criteria for Junior Research Fellowship (JRF) and Eligibility for Lectureship shall be decided by the UGC before the publication of (the) result.” In answer to a query from the University of Kerala on this issue on Wednesday, a senior UGC official reportedly explained that the final qualification cut-off arrived at by the UGC was in relation to the top scores in each paper. This information is confidential and this was why it was not published earlier. No change There was no post-result alteration of any norm, the official reportedly added. Despite repeated attempts, the Deputy Secretary of the National Educational Testing Division Surender Singh could not be reached for comment.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by om prakash singh on September 20, 2012 at 1:26

i am also

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Vinod Gaikwad on September 20, 2012 at 1:26

Be prepare for Negative Marking in the next NET exam

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• …
• 11
• Next ›
• Page