LIS Links
First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India
LIS Links Becoming More Social
Birthdays
Birthdays Today
Latest Activity
"Call for Chapter Contribution in Editorial Book "Introduction to Metrics Studies"
https://drive.google.com/drive/home"
COLLNET 2025: 19th International Conference on Advancing Research in Webometrics, Informetrics & Scientometrics (WIS) and the 24th COLLNET Meeting at Hybrid Mode (In-Person & Virtual).
September 19, 2025 at 9am to September 21, 2025 at 5pm
Online-Lecture on "AI Tools for Academic Research Writing and Publishing" at Microsoft Teams (Online)
August 4, 2025 from 2pm to 4pm
Online-Lecture on "AI Tools for Academic Research Writing and Publishing" at Microsoft Teams (Online)
August 4, 2025 from 2pm to 4pm
Present NET pattern
Dear all,
I am of the opinion that the present pattern of UGC NET examination has several inherent basic flaws and is therefore not a better asssessment or filtration system. It does not necessarily separate the wheat from the chaff.
Being an objective examination with no negative marking, the passing of the examination has become just a matter of chance and not necessarily that of intelligence. UGC has made a mockery of such an important examination as NET. In trying to simplify the examination, it has only diluted the process wherein any Tom, Dick and Harry can aspire to clear the same.
Earlier we had Descriptive pattern wherein - the ability of the students to express, analyse in depth and present the pros and cons of a topic, hold on to a argument, language and comprehension skills etc were tested. The candidates were tested in a credible crucible.
All that has gone now. Should we embrace such a system??
Views: 3403
Replies to This Forum
-
Permalink Reply by R K on
-
U r absolutely incorrect.If u see the standard of questions in Net June then you find that without deep knowledge no one can cross this obstacle.Earlier NET was only for student who is expert in memorise the things not understand the matter,now the real champs will come to the dice.
I thing u try to understand these things.
-
Permalink Reply by krishna roshan on
-
i agree with Mr. R.K.
-
Permalink Reply by Chinnadurai. D on
-
you are wrong Mr.Sarvesh. i am agree to RK
-
Permalink Reply by Anjana Bunkar on
-
R.K. sir is right
-
Permalink Reply by saumen Datta on
-
u r right R.K. ji
-
Permalink Reply by Nirmala Kumari on
-
R.K. sir is right
-
Permalink Reply by Bibliothecar on
-
The persons whose are seen the current Jun 2012 question papers never raise these type of questions. I wonder that how can one tick answer in fluke. Each n every question in the exam make us to think more, not like descriptive answer. In description type, One can impress the valuation officer by their good handwriting, underline in side headings, diagrams charts tables etc., without core point answer for the particular question. Its not possible in objective type questions. Hope you will understand.
-
Permalink Reply by Sudesh Kumar on
-
Dear Sarvesh
Discriptive pattern is for those who have great cramming power and who have good handwriting.
And the objective pattern is for those who possess indepth knowldge of subject and clear concept.
Now the evaluater canot favour a person having good handwriting. Also the evaluation is out of evaluaters ego and mood.
-
Permalink Reply by Shashi Kant Jatwa on
-
Dear Sarvesh ji,
The present pattern of NET exam is very good.
-
Permalink Reply by Digambar Bhaurao Waghmare on
-
R K sir you are right I agree with you
Thanks
Digambar Bhaurao Waghmare
-
Permalink Reply by chetan chauhan on
-
Dear Mr. Sarvesh
R u thinks if NET exam pattern is change like objective type of answer, all students will clear NET exam, than your thinking is wrong. If you check paper 3 is not easy all question not only library science. Its was used deep knowledgeIf you know about I.P.S & I.A.S exam pattern is also like objective types.
-
Permalink Reply by Kulmeet Kaur on
-
I am also agree with Mr.R.K
© 2025 Created by Dr. Badan Barman.
Powered by
