Replies to This Forum

Permalink Reply by KAMBIAKMUAN GUITE on May 21, 2015 at 16:37

exactly i agreed with you.Why did they just decide only for one criteria? and that too with 75%. i dont think there will be many students who got 75% in any University(as a regular)..if im wrong correct me............they should conduct a written examination if the application is in large number.

To me, a agreed with you and something need to be done.

and i wanted to know from which university they have been graduated and was it regular or correspondence..to those who were eligibility for interview.....

but anyway all the best to all those we are going to give interview.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Siddu on May 21, 2015 at 17:00

I think, (I am not sure though, legal opinion would be required) the criteria of selection has to be challenged in an appropriate court of law and the stay has to be obtained on selection as early as possible)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by VISHNU K. GUPTA on May 21, 2015 at 17:36

Take appropriate action against this INJUSTICE.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dr. Syed nehal Imam on May 21, 2015 at 18:22

I think it is totally wrong decision by National Green tribunal. They have asked BLIS + two years experience in library and a desired qualification Diploma in computer. Question of 75% does not arise for screening.

Kinlyput RTI to authority for proper action. It is just arbitrary decision.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Siddu on May 21, 2015 at 23:27

Dear Dr. Imam,

what do you think should be the RTI query? Will it help?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Manoj Kumar Sahu on May 21, 2015 at 18:28

Hello,

This is really a very important issue and thanking you to bring this issue before all library professionals. As personally i will condemn selection criteria for Job selection. In regular study there are very less chances to get 75% or above. 

We should associate again this type of selection criteria as LIS Professional.Everybody should get fare chances to appear in screening test or interview. This will affect many... definitely it is not my personal issue or problem but should be voice of all Library Professional.

All should comment on this burning issue and support for this cause for the welfare of LIS Profession.

Thank you,

MANOJ KUMAR SAHU

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by KAMBIAKMUAN GUITE on May 21, 2015 at 18:37

exactly......Sir, getting  even 70% in a Regular Course is "rare". the decision really suprise me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Manoj Kumar Sahu on May 21, 2015 at 18:30

Hello,

This is really a very important issue and thanking you to bring this issue before all library professionals. As personally i will condemn selection criteria for Job selection. In regular study there are very less chances to get 75% or above. 

We should associate again this type of selection criteria as LIS Professional.Everybody should get fare chances to appear in screening test or interview. This will affect many... definitely it is not my personal issue or problem but should be voice of all Library Professional.

All should comment on this burning issue and support for this cause for the welfare of LIS Profession.

Thank you,

MANOJ KUMAR SAHU

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Harin on May 21, 2015 at 19:23

I have also applied for the post of librarian in National Green Tribunal.
but iam not shortlisted

in advt, they said that 55% and 2 year exps,
now they said that 75 %

if they can said it before only the candidates who have secured 75% marks, only apply to this post.

this is injustice.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Siddhartha Shankar Ray on May 21, 2015 at 22:44

Dear Ms. Swati,

Thanks for your post and for exposing the issue in the professional forum.

Really, it is a burning example of blatant injustice and certainly it deserves protest.

I have gone through the other posts (seven altogether so far and I expect many more within a short while from now)

I thank you all personally for the solidarity.

However,  as I feel, before proceeding to any legal activities, please go through their advertisement.

Please see whether they have mentioned the statuary sentence "mere fulfilling the minimum eligibility criteria does not entitle any candidate to be shortlisted  for interview &/or selected"  

If they have mentioned in the advertisement, I do not think much can be done legally.

I do not want to dishearten any one but I just mentioned it so that you can act accordingly

Sincerely,

Siddhartha Shankar Ray, Calcutta.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Siddu on May 21, 2015 at 23:09

Sir,
Can you kindly explain how the inclusion of the sentence "mere fulfilling the minimum eligibility criteria does not entitle any candidate to be shortlisted for interview &/or selected" in their advertisement will absolve them (The Tribunal) of any legal obligation?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Siddhartha Shankar Ray on May 21, 2015 at 23:35

Dear Mr. Siddu,

The thing is simply, they have made it clear in advance that they retain the autonomy to call candidates according to their discretion.

I am not aware of its legal consequences though that is why I proposed to go through the advertisement once again.

But as I understand this particular sentence safeguards the advertisers from legal hassles. In an advertisement this particular sentence saved a reputed National Research Laboratory from legal hassles  a couple of years ago but in those days there was no RTI in force.

Sincerely,

Siddhartha Shankar Ray, Calcutta 

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page