LIS Links
First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India
LIS Links Becoming More Social
Birthdays
Birthdays Today
Latest Activity
National Level Workshop on “Smart Publishing in the Digital Age: Strategies for Journal Publishing and Academic Profile Management” (Hybrid Mode) on 15th November 2025 at Hybrid Mode
Request to Participate in Research Study on AI Adoption in LIS at India
ICSSSM 2025: First International Conference on Smart Systems and Social Management at The Assam Royal Global University, Guwahati
22nd MANLIBNET Convention and International Conference on Marching Beyond the Libraries: Talent, Technology, and Transformation (ICMBL) at KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha
One Nation One Subscription for Research Excellence at Government Degree College, Mulugu,
International Conference on Transforming Libraries for Viksit Bharat 2047: Advancing Digital Innovation Services in Higher Education, Public and Community Libraries at Swami Vivekananda Subharti Univversity Meerut
Rectification of Anomaly in U.G.C. Regulation 2010; Granting Study Leave with Pay for Acquiring Ph.D. while in Service for “College Librarians”: Letter from COLNI
Replies to This Forum
-
Permalink Reply by Jagjit singh on
-
Respected sir
Also consider following demands of college librarian:
Rectification in the UGC norms of API for College Librarian in Appendix III
Table VII in the UGC guidelines dated 30.6.2010.
Sir,
UGC issued guidelines on 30.6.2010 for the minimum point norms of the APIs for the promotion of College Teachers, College Director of Physical Education and College Librarian. Sir , there is a mistake in the above mentioned table in category III Research and Academic contribution for promotion of College Librarian from stage 1 to stage 2, stage 2 to stage 3 and stage 3 to stage 4 as follows:
IV
Research and Academic Contribution (Category III) – Minimum Annual Score Required – to be assessed cumulatively
5/Year
(40 assessment period)
10/Year
(100 assessment period)
15/ Year
(90 assessment period)
Sir, the assessment period for promotion from stage 1 to stage 2 is minimum 4 year instead of 40/assessment period minimum score should have been 20/assessment period @ 5/year (as mentioned in case of corresponding College Teachers and College Director of Physical education). The assessment period for promotion from stage 2 to stage 3 is 5 year instead of 100/assessment period minimum score should have been 50/assessment period @ 10/year (as mentioned in case of corresponding College Teachers and College Director of Physical Education). Similarly the assessment period for promotion from stage 3 to stage 4 is 3 year instead of 90/assessment period minimum score should have been 45/assessment period @ 15/year.
- Attachments:
-
-
promnotionofLibrarianinCollege.jpg, 2.8 MB -
PromotionofDPIinCollege.jpg, 3.3 MB
-
PromotionofteacherinCollege.jpg, 3.1 MB
-
-
-
Respected sir
Also consider following demands of college librarian:
Rectification in the UGC norms of API for College Librarian in Appendix III
Table VII in the UGC guidelines dated 30.6.2010.
Sir,
UGC issued guidelines on 30.6.2010 for the minimum point norms of the APIs for the promotion of College Teachers, College Director of Physical Education and College Librarian. Sir , there is a mistake in the above mentioned table in category III Research and Academic contribution for promotion of College Librarian from stage 1 to stage 2, stage 2 to stage 3 and stage 3 to stage 4 as follows:
IV
Research and Academic Contribution (Category III) – Minimum Annual Score Required – to be assessed cumulatively
5/Year
(40 assessment period)
10/Year
(100 assessment period)
15/ Year
(90 assessment period)
Sir, the assessment period for promotion from stage 1 to stage 2 is minimum 4 year instead of 40/assessment period minimum score should have been 20/assessment period @ 5/year (as mentioned in case of corresponding College Teachers and College Director of Physical education). The assessment period for promotion from stage 2 to stage 3 is 5 year instead of 100/assessment period minimum score should have been 50/assessment period @ 10/year (as mentioned in case of corresponding College Teachers and College Director of Physical Education). Similarly the assessment period for promotion from stage 3 to stage 4 is 3 year instead of 90/assessment period minimum score should have been 45/assessment period @ 15/year.
- Attachments:
-
-
promnotionofLibrarianinCollege.jpg, 2.8 MB
-
PromotionofDPIinCollege.jpg, 3.3 MB
-
PromotionofteacherinCollege.jpg, 3.1 MB
-
© 2025 Created by Dr. Badan Barman.
Powered by
