LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

What do you think about the decision of UGC for negative marking in NET examination. would it be more useful to evaluate the skills and qualities of students.
Is there need of negative marking or not?

Views: 505

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Negative marking is really necessary to minimise "NET by Chance."

It will find out the real talents.
negative marking is good.because student will not trying our luck ,the student who work hard .then he will get succes.
negative marking system is useful for talented and hard working students, but marking pattern for different categories wise different passing pattern i want for all students that's remain same when real talent is find
I Agree with Kamlakar Dhabale
Hello Yusuf,

I personally think negative marking is a good attempt to promote the genuine canditates aspiring for NET. In my opinion negative marking won't affect the performance of candidates, because if the candidate is confident that he/she has attempted the enough questions for qualifying the paper, there is no need to attempt the questions he/she is not familiar with.

Nice question asks , Many students r more stress given for P-III, but P-I, P-II is more important b,case lot of students not passed in P-I,II so more then 60-70% students r not qualify 4 P-III so look at the results of Dec-2009 NET, The first paper is quite difficult & plus negative marking system is applied so lot of confusion ..
again UGC dec that Negive marking system is not apply for the next NET exam its good decision 4 students point of view

RSS

© 2024   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop