Replies to This Forum

Permalink Reply by Arshad Ali on March 20, 2013 at 19:00

1. possibility if DB concurs with Single Bench judgement, then UGC may be appeal In SC.

2. but in my opinion, UGC would never appeal in SC due to some loopholes, like Supplementary Result is the biggest problem now for UGC, (madam for your kind information, in Supplementary Result for JRF total is 1685 & for NET total is 13493 grand total of both (JRF & NET) is 15178 approximate.

out of 15178 more than 50% are passed securing less than 50% aggregate in all three papers.

this is  a big question now for UGC to answer, because UGC appealed in KHC against Single Judge(SJ) verdict, saying that by this SJ verdict may be higher education standard lower by passing less than 65% 60% 55% respectively.

then where this is justice those who scores 42%, 43%, 44% & 45% and so have been qualified NET.

while NET is same for all subjects, then why discrimination.

3. if DB of KHC orders neither for 65% nor for 50% and KHC fix 60%, then this is again injustice.

 hopefully, court would not do alike.

but possibility of your dough is strongly available in the case.......

best regards, 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Vijayalakshmi Sailapathi on March 20, 2013 at 21:04

So...when it is not any secret anymore that UGC Supplementary results are not of any standard... do you mean to say that it will pass in to history without anyone challenging it? As far as I know that these things have already been mentioned in SC in the SLPs filed by Researchers association challenging the Delhi HC verdict that has been clubbed with SLPs by MPhil holders challenging the Madras HC Judgement. The DB Judges know fully well that these petitioners are watching and so are eager on the Judgement that is going to be pronounced by it.

The matter will never get a conclusion at KDB. But both the petitioners and UGC will claim victory and the travails of the NET aspirants and NET holders will continue to be the same!

• ▶ Reply