First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India
Yes madam. I agree with you on this. Unless UGC is made to realise its folly and is proved beyond any uncertain terms that it cannot get away with that, the matter is only bound to drag on.
I completely agree with you on the solution suggested but a word of caution - what will happen to those who have cleared JUNE and DEC 2012 examinations however ill structured or diluted they were! This will only result in another round of litigation.
There are two type of verdict possible from the DB. If the DB concurs with Single Bench then the UGC will go for appeal in SC and then the SC word will be the final. SC seldom refutes a verdict that has got concurrence at all the levels at HC. But there is a second possibility of DB delivering a indulgent Judgement that is difficult for any party to challenge by invoking a SLP at SC. IF KHC does not do it then the scamsters in UGC/ MHRD will ensure that one of the HC in India does it. This happened earlier when UGC 2006 Second Amended regulation was challenged with respect to Teachers Recruitment Board Notification in Tamilnadu. The TRB notified that all of NET, MPhil and PhD can apply as per UGC's then regulation for which it will award a weightage of 15 for PhD and 0 for rest. There were several petitions filed in every angle by PhD holders, MPhil holders and MPhil (Before '93) etc. Justice Prabha Sreedhevan awarded stay of both the TRB Notification and UGC regulation in Single Bench and that created euphoria to all the petitioners. Things went for appeal to DB in many HC, including Madras HC. Justice Ibrahim Khalifulla + 1 listened to the arguments of all the parties in the DB creating hope for all by every day by his observations. In the end he vacated the stay and Ordered that TRB should award 9 marks for PhD, 6 for Mphil and 5 for NET (No basis specified for it) for which every advocates representing their clients claimed victory. Practically that did not meant anything to the petitioners for all the TRB positions got awarded to PhD holders only for the rest cold not bridge the gap. They could not bridge the gap even if it is 3 for PhD, 2 and 1 for MPhil and NET for even a single mark difference will ensure bias. The SC dismissed all the SLPs filed for they felt the innovative(!) Judgement of MHC ensured Justice. In our case if the DB of KHC Ordered that cut off is neither 65% as per revised UGC nor 50% as per original notification but, 60% by its Order, then it will create the same fix!
Madam......pls try to suggest solution dont create another problem to solve one...
if u want to scrap the exams what will happend to those who studied hard and passed...
everyone will go in court again
If u have pain in stomach ....there is no need to cut it u have only to take medicine for it............
Yesterday hearing from morning 10.30 am to 4.30 pm. Every argument finished both UGC and petitioners. Judgment will come on next week.
In a day the Judge will examine close to 70 to 100 items. All the NET petitions are just one item for the bench. So the Court would have just given it 15 minutes maximum to adjourn to the next scheduled date
Akhir yesa kab tak chalta rahega jaldi hi koi FINAL dicision Dena chahiye KHC ko
any one have the information for ugc net june 2012 that when the khc judgement will finally come
Dear Friends
Everyone is asking about what happened regarding the verdict of Kerala High Court Division Bench. As clarified in the previous post, after the abeyance of the judgement on 25th March, it is anticipated generally that the verdict is announced within 14 days. Now 9 days are passed. Wait another 5 days. the verdict may be declared any time
© 2026 Created by Dr. Badan Barman.
Powered by
