LIS Links
First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India
LIS Links Becoming More Social
Birthdays
Latest Activity
6th LISACON 2026 at Bangalore. India
November 12, 2026 at 9am to November 14, 2026 at 5pm
Two-Day Online National Workshop on Library Automation Using Koha at Cooch Behar, West Bengal
October 2, 2026 at 11am to October 3, 2026 at 5pm
Two-Day Online National Workshop on "Library Automation Using Koha" at Online
October 2, 2026 at 11am to October 3, 2026 at 5pm
72nd ILA Annual Conference – International Conference on “Future Libraries: Advancing Research and Excellence (FLARE 2027)” at Indira Gandhi Memorial Library, University of Hyderabad, Gachibowli
January 7, 2027 to January 9, 2027
The Right Solution to UGC Fiasco
The right solution to this fiasco is possible only if the UGC is pressurized to scrap the June 2012 and Dec 2012 examination. Of course there will definitely be a lot of broken hearts. But the verdict of Kerala High Court is not a comprehensive one and so will be stoutly resisted by UGC by all means. If the Judgement of Kerala HC is made applicable to non petitioners then the pass percentage will be touching 80% and that is several lakhs of candidates. That will dilute the value of UGC and thus will make it easy for the NET review committee to scrap all the NET scheme. Then again it will be a Court proceeding and this time the UGC will say, "UGC has been permitted earlier by Court to dump MPhil and PhD. Then why not NET and SET?"
June 2012 and Dec 2012 NET examination is an aberration and so the Court should also be given a option to scrap it with due penalties to UGC.
Please let the forum discuss on this
Views: 998
Replies to This Forum
-
Permalink Reply by Arshad Ali on
-
Janab,
with out fighting by UGC for said above issues we cant take our rights, which is ours fundamental right.
today is also a hearing of KHC, DB. it is possible but little time taking in my opinion. Here read and take oath as said below.
-
Permalink Reply by Vijayalakshmi Sailapathi on
-
Quantity vs quality
By Sanju OrkutBy increasing the minimum marks UGC proved that their question papers were substandard.
.......This is the opening line of a blog!
-
Permalink Reply by umesh wagh on
-
The biggest mistake by UGC in UGC NET June 2012 is that the criteria for declaration of result is given after the result...This is totally wrong policy applied...
-
-
Respected madam If the Judgement of Kerala HC is made applicable to non petitioners then the pass percentage will be touching 35% aprox not 80%
-
-
I know it is just your guess. Mine is a guesstimate! But I am sure that my figure will be more close to the reality
-
-
Dear madam
From Press release...UGC NET 2012
Total number of candidate registered: 7,07,009
Total Number of candidate passed: 47582 (43,957 NET + 3625 JRF)
and about 2,12,000 are fighting against UGC source :UGC Net victims,
so total number of students will pass after Judgement of Kerala HC is made applicable to non petitioners will be 2,12,000+ 47,582 = 2,59,582 aprox. out of 7,00,000 = 37% aprox
so tell me madam from where your 80% has come
your is only guess my is more close to reality...
-
-
But in real life it will not be all who will be taking things to the Court. So it will certainly be 80%
-
-
madam 2,12,000 log court nahi gaye hai... inhone minimum criteria qualify kiya hai aur court ke natije ka intezar kar rahe hai....
the overall number is 37%
i dont knw from where 80% passing have come as only about 81% appeared in the UGC NET June 2012
-
-
Have you estimated the percentage taking all of Jun 2012, Dec 2012 and the couple of SET exams? Remember that the same applicant might have appeared in all the exams. In Tamilnadu the estimate will be definitely above 80% by a guesstimate by commonsense.
© 2026 Created by Dr. Badan Barman.
Powered by
