Latest Activity

DHANANJAY updated their profile
1 hour ago
JITENDRA MAHAWAR updated their profile
yesterday
Animesh Das updated their profile
yesterday
Gangaram Mogara Pawara updated their profile
Thursday
Navdeep Sharma updated their profile
Thursday
Ku. Dipti Lodwal posted a status
"2Days Int. Seminar "Libraries and Information Technology:A Global Platform for Multidisciplinary Knowledge Integration&Innovation"28-29 Mar."
Wednesday
Samit Mondal shared DHIRAJ KIRAN CHOGALE's event on Facebook
Wednesday
GAURAV BHUSAN ARYA shared a profile on Facebook
Feb 13
Bidyut Bikash Kalita posted a blog post
Feb 13
Profile IconDhanu shri, Kumari Ankita, Arunima Giri and 2 more joined LIS Links
Feb 13
Dr. Badan Barman posted a discussion
Feb 13
Abhishek Chourasiya updated their profile
Feb 11
Profile IconSweety Angelirie Kharumnuid and Alka Solanki joined LIS Links
Feb 11
Dr. SUDHI S VIJAYAN posted an event
Feb 11
A.Mahesh left a comment for Dr. Badan Barman
Feb 9
Dr. N K Pachauri posted a discussion
Feb 9
A.Mahesh posted a blog post
Feb 9
Profile IconKatie Rodgerson, Swapna Khandekar, Ajay parmar and 9 more joined LIS Links
Feb 9
Kirtisharma updated their profile
Feb 6
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Feb 5

How many people had applied for the post code 69/10 and not eligible for post code 2/13 due to over age (30 + now)?

They are not taking the exam for the post code 69/10 even they have clearly mention in their advertisement 1/13  that the exam of  this post also be conduct with the post code 2/13 but now they are denying the exam that this exam will be conduct after 2/13 but how it can be possible that only 15 posts against post code 69/10  will conduct after this they will simply say that post code 69/10 is going for cancellation.

If some one agree with my views kindly do the needful as soon as possible.

Views: 1187

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

3000 people have rejected .....but not genuine region mention here . How can do they do this ....

We should come together against dsssb before 20.9.13 my no is 9210337896

(vi) Reference was also made to orders dated 21st January, 2011 passed by the Directorate of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi as per which the post of librarian has been declared as teaching post for all purposes making librarians entitled to avail all the benefits applicable to the teaching category in prospective manner.

WP(C) No.7130/2011 & 7939/2011 Page 7 of 32

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.

MAY 18, 2012/pk

WP(C) No.7130/2011 & 7939/2011 Page 32 of 32

Attachments:

Yes we should come together against dsssb. my no. is 9416815261.my post code no.is 69/10

but kaise?

Today I made a complain in public grivience office ito m bloack if any one from same condition I mean rejected for 2/13 but eligible for 69/10 he/she can make a complaint against dsssb in objection box in dsssb as well as public grivience office before 20.9.13 so that their

what a procedure of complain 

i am also with u. my mob. no. is 8506055229

simply make a complain on A4 sheets on the name Public grivence officer , m-block , ito , delhi and  make a simple draft that you are eligible for 69/10 and they are not conducting any exam for this post whereas they clearly mention in the notification that the exam for the said post shall also be conduct alongwith post code 2/13 

Yes,

I agree with this, for PGT age limit is 42 years for women , so why not for the librarians and not ready to take exam for 69/10.

 

i have a candidate has same problem. if you have also same problem then you all can meet together and go to court for relief to consider your application in coming future exams

regards

sudhir verma

9136897947

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp