Latest Activity

ANKITA GUPTA and PRASANNA R are now friends
4 hours ago
Debabrat Senapati updated their profile
13 hours ago
Anasua Ghosh joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
23 hours ago
Barsa Patnaik updated their profile
yesterday
ajit kumar updated their profile
yesterday
OSS Prasad updated their profile
yesterday
Profile IconPrem prakash Shukla, Sunitkumar, Shivam Tanwar and 25 more joined LIS Links
Friday
melvin jebaraj posted an event
Friday
Puneet Kumar posted a blog post
Friday
Dr. Badan Barman and THAKKAR VIVEK RAJESHKUMAR are now friends
Friday
Mr.Vipul Kumar updated their profile
Friday
Mr.Vipul Kumar replied to Dr. Badan Barman's discussion Circular from Gujarat Government-Page-1 in the group Circular in Library and Information Science
Friday
Mr.Vipul Kumar joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Friday
Mrs. Yasmin Ismail updated their profile
Wednesday
Mrs. Yasmin Ismail posted a status
"HAPPY LIBRARIANS DAY"
Wednesday
S. Jaffer Basha left a comment for Pallavi Sushant Sapkal
Tuesday
Mrs. Yasmin Ismail and SAGHIR ALAM KHAN are now friends
Tuesday
Shilpa Dhoble and Ravish Verma are now friends
Aug 10
Samir Rama fatte and Dr. Anjaneya Naik are now friends
Aug 10
Appasaheb Naikal updated their profile
Aug 10

How many people had applied for the post code 69/10 and not eligible for post code 2/13 due to over age (30 + now)?

They are not taking the exam for the post code 69/10 even they have clearly mention in their advertisement 1/13  that the exam of  this post also be conduct with the post code 2/13 but now they are denying the exam that this exam will be conduct after 2/13 but how it can be possible that only 15 posts against post code 69/10  will conduct after this they will simply say that post code 69/10 is going for cancellation.

If some one agree with my views kindly do the needful as soon as possible.

Views: 1240

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

3000 people have rejected .....but not genuine region mention here . How can do they do this ....

We should come together against dsssb before 20.9.13 my no is 9210337896

(vi) Reference was also made to orders dated 21st January, 2011 passed by the Directorate of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi as per which the post of librarian has been declared as teaching post for all purposes making librarians entitled to avail all the benefits applicable to the teaching category in prospective manner.

WP(C) No.7130/2011 & 7939/2011 Page 7 of 32

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.

MAY 18, 2012/pk

WP(C) No.7130/2011 & 7939/2011 Page 32 of 32

Attachments:

Yes we should come together against dsssb. my no. is 9416815261.my post code no.is 69/10

but kaise?

Today I made a complain in public grivience office ito m bloack if any one from same condition I mean rejected for 2/13 but eligible for 69/10 he/she can make a complaint against dsssb in objection box in dsssb as well as public grivience office before 20.9.13 so that their

what a procedure of complain 

i am also with u. my mob. no. is 8506055229

simply make a complain on A4 sheets on the name Public grivence officer , m-block , ito , delhi and  make a simple draft that you are eligible for 69/10 and they are not conducting any exam for this post whereas they clearly mention in the notification that the exam for the said post shall also be conduct alongwith post code 2/13 

Yes,

I agree with this, for PGT age limit is 42 years for women , so why not for the librarians and not ready to take exam for 69/10.

 

i have a candidate has same problem. if you have also same problem then you all can meet together and go to court for relief to consider your application in coming future exams

regards

sudhir verma

9136897947

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp