Latest Activity

Preeti Sharda updated their profile
10 hours ago
1994 updated their profile
13 hours ago
1994 and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
13 hours ago
vijayakumar.m updated their profile
13 hours ago
VINOD D updated their profile
13 hours ago
ASIF ALI updated their profile
15 hours ago
Manjunath Dodamani updated their profile
16 hours ago
CHANDRAN VELMURUGAN is now friends with Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN and BMS PUBLISHING HOUSE
17 hours ago
Shweta Vijendra Pathak posted an event
Thumbnail

📚 National Level Online Workshop – Librarian's Day Celebration 2026 at Online (Zoom Platform)

August 12, 2026 from 10:30am to 1pm
17 hours ago
SAVITHA S updated their profile
17 hours ago
KODELA SAI BABU updated their profile
18 hours ago
Dr. Ashwini Latte updated their profile
19 hours ago
Lili Sahu updated their profile
19 hours ago
Sugirthan Karthikeyan updated their profile
19 hours ago
Gurunathan Nagarajan updated their profile
19 hours ago
Shivakrishna S D updated their profile
19 hours ago
Pramod Kumar updated their profile
19 hours ago
Prashant Kumar Singh updated their profile
20 hours ago
Sanjay Nayak updated their profile
21 hours ago
RUSHIKESH HODSHIL updated their profile
21 hours ago

May Artificial Intelligence help in library classification?

So many conferences and debates are taking place on role of Artificial Intelligence in LIS.  Can Artificial Intelligence help librarians in classifying the reading materials?

Views: 1048

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Thank you Sir, for initiating a good discussion on an interesting topic. All the replies above are enlightening. Personally, I'll be very happy if an exhaustive auto-classification scheme is made on the basis of CC. Is there already any research towards this? Or, something has been done?

Dear Bahni Madam,

Thanks for your kind words and your reply !

In my opinion the freely faceted scheme can only be suitable for an intelligent system. CC Seventh edition is almost faceted but problem is the coverage. It doesn't include latest subjects. The new edition gets too much time that's why people prefer DDC as it has been revising frequently in reasonable time. 

The main problem is that the work of Dr. Ranganathan is not being extended by the librarians of India properly. The work of Sarda Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science is also very slow and not significant (in compare to the expectations).

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp