LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

LIS Links Becoming More Social

Latest Activity

Samit Mondal replied to Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN's discussion Call for Book Chapters: Digital Leadership in Library & Information Centers (Innovative Strategies in Library Management) by Ess Ess Publications.
1 hour ago
Mr.Vipul Kumar updated their profile
9 hours ago
Rakesh Sehrawat might attend Dr. Sandip Pathak's event
Thumbnail

13th Convention Planner 2026 at Gauhati University,  Guwahati, Assam.

September 18, 2026 at 9am to September 20, 2026 at 7pm
22 hours ago
Mrinal khare is attending Sumedha Singh's event
yesterday
Dr. Anil Kumar Jharotia left a comment for Munmi Saikia
Wednesday
Dr. Anil Kumar Jharotia left a comment for Jasveer Kaur
Wednesday
Dr. Anil Kumar Jharotia left a comment for Asha v madabhavi
Wednesday
Dr. Anil Kumar Jharotia left a comment for ASHMITA VERMA
Wednesday
Dr. Chiranjeevi L M updated their profile
Wednesday
Dr. Bhopendra Kumar updated their profile
Wednesday
SALAM BINOY SINGH is attending Dr. Sandip Pathak's event
Thumbnail

13th Convention Planner 2026 at Gauhati University,  Guwahati, Assam.

September 18, 2026 at 9am to September 20, 2026 at 7pm
Tuesday
Paradip Sen Roy updated their profile
Tuesday
vandana mittal replied to hem chandra's discussion Updating Shelf Location in Bulk in Egranthalaya 3.0
Tuesday
vandana mittal updated their profile
Tuesday
Akash Pathave updated their profile
Tuesday
Sanjana Saini is now a member of LIS Links
Tuesday
NAVEEN VIKRAM SINGH shared a profile on Facebook
Monday
Sanjeev Kalita updated their profile
Monday
pooja katoch updated their profile
Monday
vaishaliingale73 and VIJAYAKUMAR V are now friends
Sunday

Age of Retirement of Library Professionals is 65?

33. To conclude, we are of the opinion that the matter is not appropriately examined by the respondent authorities while excluding the categories of Librarians and DPEs from the benefit of enhancement of superannuation age which is accorded to the teachers. Various important aspects are left out which could not have been ignored and that vitiates the decision making process. It is, thus, imperative that the matter be examined afresh by the respondent authorities in the light of the discussions contained in this decision and an informed and rational decision be taken, as we do not find any justification in the reasons given by the respondents in denying the benefit of age enhancement to DPEs and Librarians.
Kindly consult the attached file for more details.

Views: 937

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

yes Badan I fully agree with this 

only 1 point
University Librarian qualification is not at par with Professors

Dear Mr Barman and all

Read out thoroughly again the verdict of Delhi high court....i just want to know whether the petitioner is move to higher court after this verdict or any further information is coming as stated in the last part that as '"These writs are disposed off with the direction that the matter shall be considered and fresh decision shall be taken within a period of two months from today".....

any further information come up or not????

regards

Subir Das

Kolkata

 

Dear Subir Sir,

I am very much sorry, I dont have any further information on this. However, if at any point I am able to collect it, will share in this post itself.

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp