First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India
33. To conclude, we are of the opinion that the matter is not appropriately examined by the respondent authorities while excluding the categories of Librarians and DPEs from the benefit of enhancement of superannuation age which is accorded to the teachers. Various important aspects are left out which could not have been ignored and that vitiates the decision making process. It is, thus, imperative that the matter be examined afresh by the respondent authorities in the light of the discussions contained in this decision and an informed and rational decision be taken, as we do not find any justification in the reasons given by the respondents in denying the benefit of age enhancement to DPEs and Librarians.
Kindly consult the attached file for more details.
Views: 880
yes Badan I fully agree with thisย
only 1 point
University Librarian qualification is not at par with Professors
Dear Mr Barman and all
Read outย thoroughlyย again the verdict of Delhi high court....i just want to knowย whether the petitioner is move to higher court after this verdict or any further information is coming as stated in the last part that as '"These writs are disposed off with the direction that the matter shallย be considered and fresh decision shall be taken within a period ofย two months from today".....
any further information come up or not????
regards
Subir Das
Kolkata
ย
Dear Subir Sir,
I am very much sorry, I dont have any further information on this. However, if at any point I am able to collect it, will share in this post itself.
ยฉ 2026 Created by Dr. Badan Barman.
Powered by
