Replies to This Forum

Permalink Reply by Munesh Kumar on June 11, 2016 at 2:27

Dear Sir,

What to say, either positive or negative? I am getting clues to talk in the both, positive and negative sides. 

Thank you. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ram Laut Tyagee on June 13, 2016 at 16:59

This is waste of time for candidates as well as for university administration

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dr.M.Muthu on June 13, 2016 at 16:59

Dear sir,

You are correct, because last few years most of the Government Institutes calling more candidates, but Normally one post 8-10 candidates only, then only they can select suitable candidate for their organization, otherwise very difficult, i am not criticize or against for calling more candidates,

my suggestions:

1.Should follow strictly API Score for scrutinize can select 8-10 candidates for per post, otherwise very difficult sir, few Central Universities clearly has given earlier as per API Score for scrutinize applications and displayed their website sir,

this is for your kind information sir, because i also selected this list Indira Gandhi National Tribal University (IGNTU) AMARKANTAK, (Madhya Pradesh) my interview on 22.06.16

by

Thanks & Regards

Dr.M.MUTHU,
IIT MADRAS,

Personal site: https://in.linkedin.com/pub/dr-muthu-m/5a/420/804

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by shraddha shahane on June 13, 2016 at 21:32

Is university ne advertisement 5-6 years tak nikala pahali ya doosari bar form phil karne ke baad bhi mujhe call nahi aaya kya yah thik hai ki last time fill karne vale candidates ko hi call kiya jaye kya university ne mere DD ka use nahi kiya hoga

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Munesh Kumar on June 14, 2016 at 22:49

With reference to above answers, I would like to evaluate this matter in two aspects; positive and negative as I have said in the previous reply.

Positive points are that a candidate will have probability, chance to be selected. Fresher will come to know the pattern of the interview. University will have more options to get a candidate, suitable for the existing setup. The moral of the candidates will remain higher because they got notified that they have eligibility for the said/applied post. 

Negative points may be extracted are as follows, some are from previous replies; Waste of time, resources and money of both, university and candidates at the individual level. Lack of fixed shortlisting criteria. Lack of competencies to answer the questions of a rejected candidate in future. 

Actually, these negative points are not considerable. It is a good practice to give value to an applicant and his/her application form who shown his/her interest and got notified by the administration that he/she is eligible for the said/applied post. The candidate will get the chance to appear in the interview where if he/she perform well then he/she can get the job. Calling/shortlisting/rejecting a candidate by his/her application form and/or only on the documentary evidence seems impractical. 

Thank you. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by HARISH KUMAR ASATI on June 25, 2016 at 8:53

I didn't received any call letter any list is there

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Amit Shahani on June 25, 2016 at 9:25

Thank you DR. ANIL SINGH For sharing your ideology. Don't waste your time. I have a new job recruitment for all of you. If you need job please visit this site Tripura psc recruitment

• ▶ Reply