LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

Dr. Rajesh Chutia updated their profile
7 hours ago
Kapil Sunehria updated their profile
yesterday
Kapil Sunehria and Millan Krushna Dutta are now friends
yesterday
Dr. N. Kadiresan left a comment for Dr. Badan Barman
Sunday
Chavda Jitendra Kumar Ambalal updated their profile
Saturday
Chavda Jitendra Kumar Ambalal joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Saturday
Chavda Jitendra Kumar Ambalal joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Saturday
Jeffrey Epstein commented on Jeffrey Epstein's album
Friday
Jeffrey Epstein commented on Jeffrey Epstein's album
Friday
S RAVI posted a status
""Call for Chapter Contribution in Editorial Book…"
Friday
S RAVI posted a status
Friday
S RAVI posted a status
"Call for Chapter Contribution in Editorial Book "Introduction to Metrics Studies" https://drive.google.com/drive/home"
Friday
Jeffrey Epstein commented on Jeffrey Epstein's album
Friday
LAITHANGBAM NEPOLEAN SINGH is attending Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN's event
Jul 30
SHWETHA KV updated their profile
Jul 29
Dr. Tarvinder Singh Handa updated their profile
Jul 29
RP Raaj updated their profile
Jul 29
LAITHANGBAM NEPOLEAN SINGH is attending Dr. A. Madhava Rao's event

Online-Lecture on "AI Tools for Academic Research Writing and Publishing" at Microsoft Teams (Online)

August 4, 2025 from 2pm to 4pm
Jul 29
Misbah Ul Huda is attending Dr. A. Madhava Rao's event

Online-Lecture on "AI Tools for Academic Research Writing and Publishing" at Microsoft Teams (Online)

August 4, 2025 from 2pm to 4pm
Jul 28
Dr. N. Kadiresan updated their profile
Jul 28

Age of Retirement of Library Professionals is 65?

33. To conclude, we are of the opinion that the matter is not appropriately examined by the respondent authorities while excluding the categories of Librarians and DPEs from the benefit of enhancement of superannuation age which is accorded to the teachers. Various important aspects are left out which could not have been ignored and that vitiates the decision making process. It is, thus, imperative that the matter be examined afresh by the respondent authorities in the light of the discussions contained in this decision and an informed and rational decision be taken, as we do not find any justification in the reasons given by the respondents in denying the benefit of age enhancement to DPEs and Librarians.
Kindly consult the attached file for more details.

Views: 839

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

yes Badan I fully agree with this 

only 1 point
University Librarian qualification is not at par with Professors

Dear Mr Barman and all

Read out thoroughly again the verdict of Delhi high court....i just want to know whether the petitioner is move to higher court after this verdict or any further information is coming as stated in the last part that as '"These writs are disposed off with the direction that the matter shall be considered and fresh decision shall be taken within a period of two months from today".....

any further information come up or not????

regards

Subir Das

Kolkata

 

Dear Subir Sir,

I am very much sorry, I dont have any further information on this. However, if at any point I am able to collect it, will share in this post itself.

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop