LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted an event
13 hours ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a blog post
14 hours ago
Profile IconAhana Guin, Harikrishnan Sahu, Akash Baliyan and 1 more joined LIS Links
18 hours ago
Saaswatee Sahoo and Ramesh Kumar are now friends
yesterday
Ramesh Kumar might attend Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN's event
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN and Naveen Dobriyal are now friends
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted an event
yesterday
Paojathang Haokip posted a status
"Thank you LIS Links for accepting me as a member."
yesterday
Naveen Dobriyal updated their profile
yesterday
Nuria Bautista posted a discussion
yesterday
Profile IconRachnaye, Ramesh Kumar, Jayashree Konwar and 91 more joined LIS Links
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
yesterday
Laxman Prasad updated their profile
Wednesday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Wednesday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Tuesday
Alekha Karadia posted a blog post
Tuesday
Profile IconRAMAKANTA SAHU, Rajendra Dhiman, Dr H Nayana and 6 more joined LIS Links
Monday
Pradeep Kumar Singh posted a discussion
Monday
Rathod Pradip J. joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Monday
Rathod Pradip J. joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Monday

Net becomes the most difficult than ever.

Views: 524

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

The new criteria of UGC is not replication of june 2012 result criteria at all.
The basic difference is that from now onwards the number of net qualified candidates will be limited to 15% of pass candidates (those who scored min qualifying marks), no matter how much one scores, whereas in june 2012 the number of net qualified candidates was not limited because if one scores 75% or above, he is qualified. The number was not limited.
Now even if you score 95% marks, you cant be sure that you will be qualified because there may be 86% candidates who would have scored more than you (mor than 95%).

I think it has become more difficult than ever.
This is all because court case.

What is your view friends?

U r right. at least theoretically!! But If u see the June 2012 result, around 10% candidates have qualified. UGC must have seen the all the performance so far and wud have zeroed down on 15% !!! But again I think they can change this criteria if they find any loopholes or if it is unrealistic. At the end of the day demand should equal supply...

But think about the condition where all of the candidates r passed ......we too...then what is the achievement.......will it be beneficial to us....society.....educational system....??????????UGC must have provided it earlier

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop