LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

Bristy Handique updated their profile
4 hours ago
meghabat singh updated their profile
10 hours ago
Elukoti Bhosle updated their profile
14 hours ago
DEVI SHANKAR DINGARA updated their profile
yesterday
ASHUTOSH KAG updated their profile
Thursday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted discussions
Thursday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Thursday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN is now friends with Ramesh Kumar and Suraj Morya
Thursday
Archanagita Saikia posted a discussion
Thursday
Manju Meerwal joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Thursday
Dr. O Seshaiaih posted a discussion
Thursday
Dr. A. Madhava Rao posted an event

Online-Lecture on "AI Tools for Academic Research Writing and Publishing" at Microsoft Teams (Online)

August 4, 2025 from 2pm to 4pm
Thursday
Dr. Badan Barman posted a blog post
Thursday
MANJEET KHATRI posted a blog post
Thursday
Profile IconRadhika J, Mohan, RP Raaj and 36 more joined LIS Links
Thursday
MANJEET KHATRI updated their profile
Wednesday
DEVI SHANKAR DINGARA shared a profile on Facebook
Tuesday
Dr.Stephen.G replied to Dr.Stephen.G's discussion Call for Papers – ICDIASLS-2025
Jul 13
Dr.Stephen.G posted a discussion
Jul 13
CHETAN RAVAL updated their profile
Jul 11

Those who got UGC NET 2012 marks more than eligible criteria please cooperate to sue case in in the court

Respected Sir/ Madam,

    Those who got marks more than eligible criteria for example

       
Category

Minimum marks (%) to be obtained

Paper-I

Paper-II

Paper-III

General

40 (40%)

40 (40%)

75 (50%)

OBC (Non-creamy layer)

35 (35%)

35 (35%)

67.5 (45%) rounded off to 68

PH/VH/SC/ST

35 (35%)

35 (35%)

60 (40%)

 

 

Those who  got eligible marks please cooperate to sue case in in the court

Thanking you

Regards

Librarin

C E S First Grade College Mannaekhelli

Facebook

Views: 27275

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Mr Vinodraj, Don't feel ur self a Great. Mind it, in your success, Luck might be act as a major role but, not talent. Those who not Qualified are not Weak intellectually, they may be excellent in Descriptive mode. In Objective mode only Memory power and Luck act as important factors in its success. You may simply have memory power but not knowledge. If you are a knowledge person, you might had encouraged the non-qualifiers by giving valuable suggestions, material for their success in their next attempt instead of showing  eyesore on them.

If a teacher with 55% of marks succeeds his duty 101% (ie., fulfills his duty) than a teacher with 99% marks who can not even 50% succeeded. Then whom the Nation prefers? The 55% or 99%? Only the so called talent (99% marks) persons can not build our Nation strong. To be a Great Teacher,  Subject Knowledge, Teaching abilities and more the DEDICATED service are important but, not the Certificates.

Remember, some use less persons are showing their EXCELLENCE by posting cheap comments, letters etc but, this forum's main aims are to cooperate and encourage each other, to get more knowledge from the co-members, to update our professional skills and trends, sharing of resources etc.

No valuable and intelligent person plays cheap tactics like you.

i am also

Hello Sir,

I m SC candidate and score 

54.00% 60.00% 52.00% Aggregate-54.86

m i qualified or not?

Give your HALL TICKET No. UGC reduced 3% to only GEN candidates but not to others in Lib. & Inf. Sc. This is as per my observation only.

Tanuja Kumari madam, I need to know whether you Qualified the NET or Not? Pl respond to me. ThanQ.

No i m not qualified. and my marks are P1- 54%, P2-60% and P-3-52% and i m SC candidate aggregate score is 54.86

 

Sure sir? i m with u. i m sc candidate

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop